<figure>
 <figcaption>
 Cover image via <a href="https://u.today/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">U.Today</a>
 </figcaption>
</figure>
In a recent <a href="https://x.com/FilanLaw/status/1792731909681795576" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">filing</a>, the US Securities and Exchange Commission opposed in part Ripple's attempt to seal and redact evidence related to the dispute regarding remedies.&nbsp;
According to the agency, Ripple fails to overcome "the strong presumption" that these filings should be public.&nbsp;
While Ripple has pointed to the SEC's earlier sealing and redaction positions, this was in the context of specific filings. Moreover, the agency has pointed to the fact that Ripple has now been adjudicated to have illegally sold investment contracts to institutional buyers without the necessary disclosures.&nbsp;
The SEC argues that Ripple's request to hide financial and securities sales information should be denied since it is "at the heart" of the arguments that both parties have presented regarding the remedies.&nbsp;
Ripple might be allowed to seal some of its financial statements. However, it should be required to disclose specific financial figures or terms of contracts that are pertinent to the remedies request. "If the public cannot see how the remedies requested and ordered compare to Ripple's actual financial information, general deterrence will be significantly undermined," the <a href="https://u.today/ripple-v-sec-day-for-final-submission-in-remedies-phase-arrives" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">SEC</a> said.&nbsp;
The SEC has added that it has limited its sealing and redaction objections to the information that will be relevant to the court's determination. The agency wants Ripple to reveal the amount of its current assets, the amount of recent sales, revenues, and expenses as well as the size of discounts.
The agency insists that it opposes the redaction of "very little" financial information.&nbsp;
As&nbsp;<a href="https://u.today/sec-v-ripple-defendant-files-motion-to-seal-documents" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">reported by U.Today</a>, Ripple insisted that the disclosure of the aforementioned documents could harm its business interests.&nbsp;

SEC Files Reply to Ripple’s Latest Motion: Details

U_Today

Other articles published on May 21, 2024

Top 5 Altcoins for Diversifying Your Portfolio

Ripple v. SEC case update as of May 21, 2024

DOGE To The Moon: Dogecoin Beats Out Cardano And XRP In This Major Metric

Sui Sets New Standard for Blockchain Transaction Speeds

BlockDAG’s Investment Appeal And Disruption Grow Amid Ethereum Classic Halving & Stellar Upgrades

Crypto Analyst Slams Gensler as Ethereum ETF Advances

Join our free newsletter for daily crypto updates!