Patrick

Chair

Read

Lawmakers discussed the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s proposal to potentially bring payment applications, including those involving crypto, under its oversight. 
The <a href="https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_nprm-digital-payment-apps-lp-rule_2023-11.pdf" data-type="link" data-id="https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_nprm-digital-payment-apps-lp-rule_2023-11.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">proposal</a>, “Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications,” aims to regulate nonbank financial companies processing over five million transactions annually, similar to the regulatory requirements for banks and credit unions. 
During the hearing, some House Financial Services subcommittee members expressed concerns about the CFPB overstepping its bounds. Rep. Mike Flood, R-Neb, questioned the legality of the CFPB claiming jurisdiction over cryptocurrencies with minimal legal basis. 
Conversely, Democrats like Rep. Stephen Lynch, D-Mass, argued for the necessity of CFPB oversight due to the <a href="https://crypto.news/markets/" data-type="link" data-id="https://crypto.news/markets/">volatile nature</a> of cryptocurrencies, which has led to significant investment losses. 
“There’s a huge amount of risk and volatility in that, and yet there are some who say there’s no risk-based reason for the CFPB to venture into this,” Lynch said.&nbsp; 
 You might also like: <a href="https://crypto.news/bitcoin-spot-ethereum-etf/"> Macroeconomist: Bitcoin to hit $100k amid spot Ethereum ETF postponement </a> 
The rule explicitly mentions <a href="https://crypto.news/market-cap/" data-type="link" data-id="https://crypto.news/market-cap/">cryptocurrencies</a> several times and has been criticized for allegedly extending the CFPB’s reach into areas like crypto transactions and self-hosted wallets without clear jurisdiction. 
Witnesses and lawmakers, including House Financial Services Committee Chair Patrick McHenry, R-N.C., and Rep. French Hill, R-Ark., have voiced concerns over the rule’s vague implications for digital assets. 
Amid discussions on <a href="https://crypto.news/ripple-outlines-how-regulatory-clarity-fosters-innovation/" data-type="link" data-id="https://crypto.news/ripple-outlines-how-regulatory-clarity-fosters-innovation/">regulatory clarity</a> for cryptocurrency firms, Rep. Warren Davidson, R-Ohio, highlighted the challenges in seeking definitive guidance from regulatory bodies. 
Christopher Odinet, a law professor, advocated for including cryptocurrencies under CFPB supervision. 
“Take, for instance, the high-profile collapse of the crypto exchange giant <a href="https://crypto.news/tag/ftx/" data-type="link" data-id="https://crypto.news/tag/ftx/">FTX</a>,” Odinet said. “It has exposed how little was previously known about the true nature of these transactions and the handling of consumer assets.”&nbsp; 
 Read more: <a href="https://crypto.news/crypto-regulation-cftc-congress/"> CFTC Chair calls on Congress to fill gap in crypto regulation </a>

Lawmakers debate CFPB oversight of payment apps and crypto

crypto.news

Other articles published on Mar 13, 2024

Grayscale to Launch Bitcoin Mini Trust Amidst ETF Expansion and Record Bitcoin Volatility

Ripple Could Hit 2018 ATHs Soon: Analyst Shares When To Expect $1 For XRP

AI Study Reveals Persistent Racial Bias in Language Models

BEFE Coin’s Ascendency: Understanding Why it’s Dominating Today’s Trends

Bitcoin Dogs exchange listing nears as total raised nears $11M

Bitcoin ETFs Break Another First! Record Money Inflow in a Single Day!

Join our free newsletter for daily crypto updates!