United

Circuit

April

when

<p>The Second Circuit Court of Appeals has given a group of investors a new opportunity to pursue their lawsuit against the cryptocurrency exchange <a href="https://www.cryptopolitan.com/binance-us-faces-setbacks-amid-lawsuit/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Binance</a>. The court reversed a previous decision by a lower court, which had dismissed the case. This lawsuit, initiated in April 2020 by crypto investors, centers on allegations that they purchased securities from Binance, including various <a href="https://www.cryptopolitan.com/how-erc-20-tokens-smart-contracts-ethereum/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">ERC-20 tokens</a>.</p>
<p>The appellate court’s decision challenges the earlier ruling by Judge Andrew Carter of the Southern District of New York. Judge Carter dismissed the lawsuit on the grounds that it had been filed after the statute of limitations had expired. He also stated that Binance did not qualify as a domestic exchange under U.S. federal securities laws due to its lack of substantial ties within the United States.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="strong-binance-lawsuit-gets-a-second-chance-in-court-strong"><strong>Binance lawsuit gets a second chance in court</strong></h2>
<p>The appeals court found that the plaintiffs had “plausibly alleged” that the transactions in question were completed on servers located in the U.S. It also highlighted that the plaintiffs accessed Binance’s services from within the country. This finding addresses the critical issue of whether transactions involving digital assets, purported to be securities, can be considered domestic transactions subject to U.S. federal securities laws.</p>
<p>The court also revisited the issue of the statute of limitations. It clarified that the clock for the statute of limitations started when the plaintiffs purchased the tokens, which was within a year of filing the lawsuit. This aspect of the ruling emphasizes the timing of legal actions in the context of digital asset transactions.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="strong-next-steps-for-the-lawsuit-strong"><strong>Next steps for the lawsuit</strong></h2>
<p>The decision to revive the<a href="https://www.reuters.com/technology/binance-must-face-revived-investor-lawsuit-us-over-crypto-losses-2024-03-08/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank"> lawsuit </a>does not conclude that the tokens involved are securities. Instead, it allows the case to return to the district court, where both parties can present arguments regarding the nature of these digital assets. This stage will be crucial in determining the applicability of federal securities laws to the tokens in question.</p>
<p>Binance, which has the option to appeal the decision to the U.S. Supreme Court, has not yet responded to requests for comment. The outcome of any potential appeal or the subsequent proceedings at the district court level, will be closely watched. It could have far-reaching implications for the regulatory landscape of digital assets in the United States.</p>
<p>The lawsuit’s progression underscores the evolving nature of legal and regulatory challenges in the cryptocurrency space. It also highlights the judiciary’s role in clarifying the application of existing laws to new forms of digital transactions. As the case moves forward, it will likely contribute to the ongoing dialogue about the regulation of cryptocurrencies and digital assets.</p>

Binance faces US court again over crypto securities allegations

Table of Contents

Cryptopolitan_News

Other articles published on Mar 9, 2024

Ripple’s XRP sales: Market impact and regulatory perspective

Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash Approach Halving Events: A Defining Moment for Bitcoin Family

Streaming to Success: DeeStream (DST) Presale Dominance Continues with Solana (SOL) and Tether (U...

BONK prices go ‘bonkers’ as exchange listing stirs frenzy

XRP Gears Up for a Potential Bull Run Amid Market Watch

FLOKI successfully executes 190 billion token burn

Join our free newsletter for daily crypto updates!