Cryptocurrency

<figure>
 <figcaption>
 Cover image via <a href="https://u.today/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">U.Today</a>
 </figcaption>
</figure>
Cryptocurrency exchange Kraken <a href="https://twitter.com/Belisarius2020/status/1760873231530266977" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">outlined</a> its defense against the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), invoking a previous court case involving Ripple Labs.&nbsp;
Kraken's argument hinges on the assertion that the SEC has failed to establish a direct relationship between the issuers of certain tokens, which the SEC deems 'crypto asset securities,' and the buyers on its platform.
The exchange's trading mechanism, which operates on a blind bid/ask system similar to Ripple's programmatic sales, is said to be beyond the purview of investment contracts—a point affirmed by Judge Analisa Torres in the Ripple case.&nbsp;
Kraken's stance challenges the SEC's classification of tokens like ALGO, ADA, and MATIC as securities, potentially impacting the broader regulatory landscape for digital assets.
<h2 id="paralleling-the-ripple-case">Paralleling the Ripple case&nbsp;</h2>
Kraken's legal defense emphasizes the lack of direct connection between token issuers and buyers, which is a critical element in defining a security under U.S. law.&nbsp;
Bill Morgan, a legal expert, stressed how the Ripple case's judgment could complicate the SEC's ability to secure a settlement in the ongoing litigation with Ripple.&nbsp;
By paralleling the <a href="https://u.today/ripple-cto-explains-how-407-billion-xrp-in-ecrow-can-be-burned" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Ripple</a> case, Kraken contends that the 11 tokens in question, which the SEC alleges are securities, do not meet the standard criteria of an investment contract, namely the expectation of profits driven by the efforts of the issuer.&nbsp;
This argument could prove to be a significant roadblock for the SEC if the judgment in the Ripple case is upheld without a successful appeal.
<h2 id="kraken-s-response-to-alleged-sec-retaliation">Kraken's response to alleged SEC retaliation</h2>
Kraken CEO Jesse Powell <a href="https://twitter.com/jespow/status/1760848531265302998" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">took to X</a> to express his concerns over the SEC's lawsuit, which he views as retribution following the exchange's congressional testimony on the SEC's overreach in the crypto industry.&nbsp;
On May 10, 2023, Kraken testified before two House committees, arguing for a more precise legal framework for digital assets and suggesting a limitation on the SEC's jurisdiction.&nbsp;
The subsequent legal action by the SEC was interpreted by Powell as intimidation and an attempt to delegitimize the exchange.&nbsp;
Kraken's motion to dismiss the lawsuit contends that the SEC's complaint lacks substance, failing to identify any direct 'investment contract' between token buyers and issuers, thereby not meeting the established criteria set forth in the Howey Test.

Kraken Cites Ripple Case in Its Response to SEC

Table of Contents

U_Today

Other articles published on Feb 23, 2024

Electronic Arts Sports Strikes Deals with Thousands of College Athletes

3 BRC-20 Altcoins To Buy With Bitcoin Halving Imminent

BRICS officially starts work on common currency

PancakeSwap Scales Up with Innovative Partnership Model for DeFi Growth

Warner Bros. Discovery Narrows Q4 Net Loss to $400 Million Amid Strategic Overhaul

Solana’s trading volume breaks £300m; Algorand and new meme coin advance

Join our free newsletter for daily crypto updates!