Freedom

Northern

<p style="text-align: justify">You can also read this news on BH NEWS: <a href="https://en.bitcoinhaber.net/kraken-exchange-challenges-secs-lawsuit-direction" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Kraken Exchange Challenges SEC’s Lawsuit Direction</a><br></p>
<p style="text-align: justify">The digital currency sphere is currently attentive to the legal confrontation between Kraken, a prominent <a href="https://en.bitcoinhaber.net/sol-coin-luna-coin-and-ceek-coin-price-analysis-and-predictions" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">cryptocurrency</a> exchange, and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Kraken has come out strongly against the SEC’s latest legal action, deeming the Commission’s approach as overly expansive and unjustified. The exchange has voiced its demands for the case to be rejected outright, countering the allegations placed against it.</p>
<h2 id="exchange-refutes-sec-s-stance-on-investment-contracts">Exchange Refutes SEC’s Stance on Investment Contracts</h2>
<p style="text-align: justify">In a decisive move, Kraken has approached the Federal District Court to push for the dismissal of the SEC’s lawsuit. A spokesperson for the exchange has made it clear that, according to legal definitions, the digital assets being scrutinized do not meet the criteria of ‘investment contracts’. Therefore, Kraken maintains that it does not operate as a securities exchange under current laws.</p>
<h2 id="wider-implications-of-sec-s-legal-assertions">Wider Implications of SEC’s Legal Assertions</h2>
<p style="text-align: justify">The SEC’s legal challenges extend beyond Kraken, touching upon broader concerns in the cryptocurrency sector regarding the classification of staking services. Filed in California’s Northern District, the lawsuit draws from allegations that surfaced nine months after Kraken’s previous settlement with the Commission. Kraken insists that the SEC has failed to provide the necessary contractual basis for its claims to hold water.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify">The Crypto Freedom Alliance of Texas (CFAT) supports Kraken’s stance, suggesting that the SEC’s current theory would inappropriately label a wide range of assets as securities, distorting the market and regulatory standards.</p>
<h2 id="exchange-demands-congressional-oversight">Exchange Demands Congressional Oversight</h2>
<p style="text-align: justify">Kraken’s grievances extend to the SEC’s quest for sweeping authority over the country’s economic sectors. The exchange calls for the U.S. Congress to take the helm in debating the extent of regulatory power to be vested in the SEC. Kraken’s request underscores the necessity of legislative discourse on the allocation of such expansive regulatory capabilities.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify">The implications of Kraken’s demands and the outcome of its legal battle with the SEC may cast long shadows over the regulatory landscape of cryptocurrencies and shape the dialogue around digital asset governance for the foreseeable future.</p>
<h5><span style="font-weight:bold;font-size:16px">The post first appeared on BH NEWS: </span> <a href="https://en.bitcoinhaber.net/kraken-exchange-challenges-secs-lawsuit-direction" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Kraken Exchange Challenges SEC’s Lawsuit Direction</a></h5>

Kraken Exchange Challenges SEC’s Lawsuit Direction

Table of Contents

BH NEWS

Other articles published on Feb 23, 2024

Ethereum ETF Faces 50/50 Approval Chance by May; Solana and Polkadot Alternative Identified as Ke...

JasmyCoin Price Prediction: JASMY Plunges 18% As Experts Say This Solana Meme Coin Might Be The B...

Introducing Mina Protocol: The Compact Blockchain for Enhanced DApp Performance

Injective introduces CW-404 standard, pioneering token innovation

Ethereum Maintains Leadership as Smart Contract Platform While Injective Rises

Reddit adds Bitcoin and Ethereum as retail interest in crypto fuels Bitbot’s presale

Join our free newsletter for daily crypto updates!