Spot

Grayscale Bitcoin Trust

<ul>
 <li>News around BTC Spot ETF has always affected its price.</li>
 <li style="font-weight: 400;">This shows that the prices of the shares that would make up a BTC spot ETF would remain prone to swings in the coin’s price.</li>
</ul>
During the intraday trading session on the 3rd of January, the price of the largest crypto asset by market capitalization, <a href="https://ambcrypto.com/search/bitcoin" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" data-wpel-link="internal">Bitcoin [BTC]</a>, <a href="https://ambcrypto.com/why-are-cryptos-like-bitcoin-ethereum-and-xrp-crashing/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" data-wpel-link="internal">plummeted</a> by 10%.&nbsp;
This decline came after the publication of a <a href="https://www.matrixport.com/institutions/research/matrix-on-target/813?utm_source=BenchmarkEmail&amp;utm_campaign=MoT_General&amp;utm_medium=email" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" data-wpel-link="external">report</a> by crypto investment services provider Matrixport. 
The report stated that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) may reject all applications before it for a spot Bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF) this month.
According to the analyst who authored the report, Markus Thielen, despite the series of meetings between applicants and the regulator and the updated S-1 prospectuses filed by them, all pending applications:
<blockquote>
 “Fall short of a critical requirement that must be met before the SEC approves.”
</blockquote>
Thielen based this opinion on the current political landscape and the SEC’s general predisposition towards crypto.
<blockquote>
 “An ETF would certainly enable crypto overall to take off, and based on Gensler’s comments in December 2023, he still sees this industry in need of more stringent compliance. From a political perspective, there is no reason to approve a Bitcoin Spot ETF that would legitimize Bitcoin as an alternative store of value.”
</blockquote>
Thielen’s report resulted in a double-digit decline in BTC’s value and the liquidation of $500 million worth of positions across derivatives exchanges within a day. 
Notably, it came after a series of predictions in December 2023 about the high chances of the SEC granting its first approval by the 10th of January.&nbsp;
In a former <a href="https://twitter.com/EricBalchunas/status/1729860124817125600" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" data-wpel-link="external">post</a> on X (formerly Twitter), senior ETF analyst at Bloomberg, Eric Balchunas, had opined that there was a 90% chance that the SEC would grant its first spot ETF approval by this date.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="550" data-dnt="true">
 People asking me if we changed odds. No, we still holding line at 90% odds of approval by Jan 10 (aka this cycle), the same odds we've had for months (before it was cool/safe). What we watching for now: more amended/final filings to roll in and clarity on in-kind vs cash creates <a href="https://t.co/uiWgfxOfzz" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">https://t.co/uiWgfxOfzz</a>
 — Eric Balchunas (@EricBalchunas) <a href="https://twitter.com/EricBalchunas/status/1729860124817125600?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">November 29, 2023</a>
</blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Another Bloomberg analyst, James Seyffart, had <a href="https://twitter.com/JSeyff/status/1738324061321666705" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">noted</a> that the amended Form S-1 filed by asset manager BlackRock could motivate the SEC to grant its approval to BlackRock’s ETF application in early January.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="550" data-dnt="true">
 UPDATE: <a href="https://twitter.com/BlackRock?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">@BlackRock</a> already submitted an updated/amended S-1 for their <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/bitcoin?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">#bitcoin</a> ETF. <a href="https://t.co/sVAL9qVmiy" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">pic.twitter.com/sVAL9qVmiy</a>
 — James Seyffart (@JSeyff) <a href="https://twitter.com/JSeyff/status/1738324061321666705?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">December 22, 2023</a>
</blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
These projections led to a surge in the positive sentiment in the BTC market, which sustained the coin’s price at an 18-month high in December. 
According to data from <a href="https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/bitcoin" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" data-wpel-link="external">CoinGecko</a>, during the 31 days, BTC’s value rose by double digits to close the trading year above the $42,000 price mark.&nbsp;
<h4>Maybe spot ETFs do not offer that much hedge against risks</h4>
With a BTC Spot ETF, investors have the opportunity to gain exposure to the coin’s price movements without having to own the coin itself.&nbsp;
It works by an ETF issuer, creating shares representing ownership in the underlying BTC. These shares are then made available for purchase on designated exchanges. 
Interested investors can buy and sell ETF shares at prices intended to closely track BTC’s current market price.&nbsp;
BTC spot ETFs have been widely touted as avenues for investors to hedge against the risks associated with directly holding the coin. 
But this time, the reaction of the coin to the series of news surrounding the potential approval of the investment vehicle has made this doubtful.
There is a consistent trend of instances where the speculation about the SEC approving a BTC ETF has impacted its price. 
This has underscored the regulator’s apprehensions regarding the nature of the volatility of the BTC market and how “legitimizing” crypto by granting such approval would cause more harm.
The race to list the first spot-traded BTC ETF began in July 2013 when Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss filed to launch the Winklevoss Bitcoin Trust. The SEC gave its decision four years later, in March 2017 when it rejected the application.&nbsp;
The New York Times <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/10/business/dealbook/winkelvoss-brothers-bid-to-create-a-bitcoin-etf-is-rejected.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" data-wpel-link="external">reported</a>:
<blockquote>
 “Within a few minutes of S.E.C.’s announcement, the price of a single Bitcoin tumbled more than 15 percent, to around $1,060.”
</blockquote>
In March 2021, Cboe BZX Exchange Inc. <a href="https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-cboebzx-2021-019/srcboebzx2021019.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" data-wpel-link="external">filed</a> a proposed rule change to list and trade shares of the VanEck Bitcoin Trust under the BZX Rule. 
After a series of delays, the SEC rejected the rule-change application, claiming that the applicant failed to show that its “Bitcoin-based commodity trusts and Bitcoin-based trust issued receipts” had been designed in such a way as to prevent “fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices.”
As <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-11-12/sec-rejects-vaneck-s-bitcoin-etf-application-to-trade-on-cboe" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" data-wpel-link="external">reported</a> by Bloomberg,
<blockquote>
 “Bitcoin extended losses after the rejection but recouped some of them in mid-afternoon trading.”
</blockquote>
By March 2023, the SEC had <a href="https://www.reuters.com/technology/us-sec-rejects-vaneck-spot-bitcoin-etf-application-third-time-2023-03-10/" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">rejected</a> all three proposals to list and trade shares of the VanEck Bitcoin Trust.&nbsp;
Another notable incidence was how BTC’s price climbed following a decision given by the three-judge panel of the DC Circuit Court of Appeals in the Grayscale Investments case against the Securities and Exchange Commission [SEC].
In October 2021, Grayscale Investments <a href="https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2021/10/19/2316640/0/en/NYSE-Arca-Files-Form-19b-4-to-Convert-Grayscale-Bitcoin-Trust-into-an-ETF.html" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">sought</a> SEC approval to convert Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (GBTC) into a BTC spot ETF. The regulator <a href="https://www.sec.gov/files/rules/sro/nysearca/2022/34-95180.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" data-wpel-link="external">rejected</a> the request, citing non-compliance with anti-fraud requirements and investor protection standards.&nbsp;
Grayscale then <a href="https://www.docdroid.net/73OjnW4/dc-circuit-petition-for-review-as-filed-pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" data-wpel-link="external">appealed</a>, arguing that the SEC’s denial was arbitrary and emphasizing its approval of “materially similar” Bitcoin futures ETFs.
By December 2022, the SEC defended its decision, stating the approved ETFs were based on futures contracts traded on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME), unlike Grayscale’s spot ETF application. 
Grayscale <a href="https://ambcrypto.com/grayscale-sends-reply-brief-to-sec-in-etf-suit-whats-next/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" data-wpel-link="internal">responded</a>, asserting that SEC’s treatment was unjust and discriminatory.
In a <a href="https://www.docdroid.net/vrehbKf/dc-cir-22-1142-01208547571-0-pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" data-wpel-link="external">decision</a> given on the 29th of August 2023, the Court of Appeals sided with Grayscale, urging the SEC to review its decision.&nbsp;
Following the court’s decision, BTC’s value <a href="https://ambcrypto.com/how-bitcoin-whales-celebrated-grayscales-victory/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" data-wpel-link="internal">rose</a> by 6% in 24 hours, showing that sentiment improved and trading activity surged.&nbsp;
This series of BTC price fluctuations experienced since 2017 suggests that a spot BTC ETF is not without its risk, especially concerning volatility in the coin’s price.&nbsp;&nbsp;
Is your portfolio green? Check the&nbsp;<a href="https://ambcrypto.com/calculator/bitcoin-profit-calculator" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" data-wpel-link="internal">Bitcoin Profit Calculator</a>
The shares and the underlying asset remain closely linked, such that when investors buy shares of a spot ETF, they are essentially gaining exposure to the actual price movements of BTC. 
Therefore, if BTC’s price experiences swings, it can also lead to fluctuations in the value of the ETF shares.

Bitcoin’s history tells us that a spot ETF approval is not without risks

AMBCrypto

Other articles published on Jan 5, 2024

AI Haggle-Bots Empower Shoppers to Command Better Bargains

Helium Farm: Revolutionizing Connectivity in the Expanding Helium Ecosystem

Taiwan nabs ACE Exchange boss for multi-million dollar fraud

Risks of Relying on AI for Tax Obligations

Celsius moves to unstake $470m in ETH for creditor repayments

Top BTC Analyst Says This Key Resistance Must Break Before Bitcoin Can Continue Its Upward Run

Join our free newsletter for daily crypto updates!