United

In a surprising move, the United States government has removed two critical provisions related to cryptocurrency anti-money laundering (AML) regulations from the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). The<a href="https://www.cryptopolitan.com/crypto-provisions-axed-2023-us-defense-bill/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow"> NDAA</a> is a significant piece of legislation that determines how the country’s defense department can utilize federal funding. The removal of these provisions has sparked debates and discussions within the cryptocurrency industry and regulatory circles.
The two provisions that have been omitted from the NDAA were aimed at addressing AML concerns associated with cryptocurrency. The first provision mandated the US Secretary of the Treasury to collaborate with banking and government regulators to establish a risk-focused examination and review system for cryptocurrencies within financial institutions. This system was designed to enhance transparency and compliance within the cryptocurrency space.
The second provision focused on combating anonymous cryptocurrency transactions, particularly those involving crypto mixers and tumblers. It required the production of a comprehensive report detailing the volumes of crypto asset transactions linked to sanctioned entities. Additionally, the report would have covered the regulatory approaches taken by other jurisdictions, guiding the implementation of cryptocurrency regulations in the United States.
<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="doubts-arise-over-us-commitment-to-crypto-aml-efforts">Doubts arise over US commitment to crypto AML efforts</h2>
Two significant pieces of legislation: <a href="https://www.armed-services.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/fy24_ndaa_conference_report1.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">influenced</a> these crypto-related amendments the Digital Asset Anti-Money Laundering Act, introduced in 2022, and the Responsible Financial Innovation Act. The latter aimed to establish precautions to prevent incidents similar to the FTX exchange controversy.
The proposed amendments were championed by a group of senators, including Cynthia Lummis, Elizabeth Warren, Kirsten Gillibrand, and Roger Marshall. These senators had been at the forefront of efforts to introduce robust AML measures within the cryptocurrency industry.
The removal of these provisions from the NDAA raises questions about the US government’s commitment to combating money laundering and terrorist funding facilitated through cryptocurrency. In recent times, authorities have been increasingly concerned about the illicit use of cryptocurrencies, leading to heightened scrutiny and discussions at various levels of government.
The Financial Services Committee of the US House of Representatives convened on November to address illegal activities within the crypto ecosystem. During the meeting, the committee examined the proactive measures taken by crypto exchanges and decentralized finance providers to prevent money laundering and terrorist financing.
<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="industry-and-regulatory-responses">Industry and regulatory responses</h2>
The cryptocurrency industry and regulatory bodies have offered mixed reactions to the removal of these provisions. While some industry players view this as a positive development, believing it could foster innovation and growth within the crypto space, others express concerns about potential risks and vulnerabilities.
Regulatory bodies, including the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), have stressed the importance of robust AML measures within the cryptocurrency sector. They argue that such measures are essential to prevent illicit activities, including money laundering and terrorist financing, that can be facilitated by cryptocurrencies.
With the removal of these AML provisions from the NDAA, the path forward for cryptocurrency regulation in the United States remains uncertain. The debate over how to strike the right balance between fostering innovation and protecting against illicit activities continues to evolve.
It is likely that discussions on cryptocurrency regulation will persist at both the federal and state levels. The cryptocurrency industry, lawmakers, and regulatory bodies will need to engage in constructive dialogue to develop effective and balanced regulatory frameworks that address the unique challenges posed by cryptocurrencies.

Crypto industry divided as US government removes AML provisions

Table of Contents

Cryptopolitan_News

Other articles published on Dec 10, 2023

Good News: Robinhood Crypto Trading is BACK in the EU

Perfect timing? Bitcoin halving meets macro conditions and ETF hopes

Solana Surpasses Ethereum in NFT Sales

Raising funds for climate change with digital assets at COP28

Bitcoin (BTC) “Past Performance is no Guarantee of Future Results” – VanEck

Floki Inu (FLOKI) vs Retik Finance (RETIK), which token to hold for 2024?

Join our free newsletter for daily crypto updates!