<p>The Indian courts have declined a consideration targeting the establishment of a regulatory framework for cryptocurrency trading, following a plea which had been brought to court by a petitioner.</p><h2 id="header-0">Beyond the court’s purview</h2><p>India’s Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Chandrachud, recently confronted a petition urging the establishment of a regulatory framework for cryptocurrency trading. According to a local media <a href="https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/money-and-banking/supreme-court-refuses-to-entertain-plea-to-frame-guidelines-for-regulation-of-trading-of-cryptocurrencies/article67524077.ece" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">report</a>, the bench, which included Justices JD Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, dismissed the plea, emphasizing that the demands presented were legislative and thus beyond the court’s direct action purview. This decision points to the judiciary’s recognition of its constraints in crafting laws, particularly in intricate domains like cryptocurrency.</p><p>The petitioner, Manu Prashant Wig, a former director at Blue Fox Motion Picture Limited currently in custody due to allegations of cryptocurrency fraud, sought relief through a public interest litigation (PIL) for crypto trading regulations in India.</p><p>The Economic Offence Wing (EOW) of the Delhi Police accused Wig in 2020 of deceiving investors with promises of high returns from crypto investments, involving 133 reported victims of the scheme. Despite this, during the hearing, the Supreme Court advised Wig to pursue legal remedies through appropriate channels, specifically for bail, underlining its inability to issue directives under Article 32 of the Constitution for legislative matters.</p><h2 id="header-1">Judiciary criticize government</h2><p>While the judiciary has found that it cannot act itself in putting in place a crypto regulatory framework, the Supreme Court has been critical of the government’s inaction on the matter. In July, India’s highest court<a href="https://medium.com/&#64;coinness.gl/indian-supreme-court-scolds-government-over-crypto-regulation-delay-e6d4be696ea7" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow"> criticized</a> the Indian government for its failure to establish clear cryptocurrency regulations.</p><p>Interestingly, while the government hasn’t acted locally, it has been making efforts to drive regulation at an international level instead. The status of cryptocurrency trading in India remains uncertain, with the country developing a regulatory framework influenced by recommendations from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the Financial Stability Board (FSB), potentially leading to legal legislation within the next several months.</p><p>Prime Minister Modi <a href="https://medium.com/&#64;coinness.gl/indian-pm-narendra-modi-calls-for-global-crypto-regulatory-framework-42765c226ff" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">called on</a> authorities internationally to establish a worldwide regulatory framework. At the recent G20 summit, it appears that member states did reach <a href="https://medium.com/&#64;coinness.gl/g20-nations-believed-to-have-agreed-upon-global-crypto-framework-b1ea56e23405" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">agreement</a> on such a framework.</p><p>The Supreme Court’s dismissal of the PIL marks a clear distinction between judicial and legislative responsibilities. As India moves closer to formulating a comprehensive crypto regulatory framework, this decision reinforces the imperative for legislative action to address mounting concerns and interests in the crypto market.</p><h2 id="header-2">Awaiting legislative action</h2><p>The outcome of these developments is keenly awaited by investors, legal experts and the crypto community, poised to shape the future landscape of cryptocurrency trading in India. The decision signifies the judiciary’s acknowledgment of its limitations and highlights the necessity for a legislative approach to effectively navigate the intricate landscape of cryptocurrency regulation.</p><p>In this evolving scenario, the verdict amplifies the importance of a well-defined regulatory framework. As the world’s most populous country grapples with the delicate task of balancing innovation and investor protection, the Supreme Court’s decision places the ball firmly in the legislative court.</p>

India’s judiciary turns down plea to formulate a crypto regulatory framework

Table of Contents

CoinNess Global

Other articles published on Nov 14, 2023

Survey: The French prefer cryptocurrencies over the stock market

Traders exploring new Dogecoin alternative, reviews growth potential

FSR Stock Price Tumbles 14%; Earnings Invite the Downfall

XRP Briefly Jumps 13%, Triggered by BlackRock’s XRP ETF Hoax

GNO Price Prediction 2024-2027: Will GNO Reach $500 Soon?

Enhanced Digital Group UK Limited Registers With FCA

Join our free newsletter for daily crypto updates!