Bank AI

<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://coinpedia.org/news/ripples-response-to-sec-lawsuit-key-developments-and-legal-expert-insights/">Ripple’s Response to SEC Lawsuit: Key Developments and Legal Expert Insights</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://coinpedia.org">Coinpedia Fintech News</a></p> 
<p>Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse has shared the company’s plan in response to the ongoing lawsuit with the U.S. SEC. The parties are working on a <a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.551082/gov.uscourts.nysd.551082.923.0.pdf">briefing </a>schedule regarding the SEC’s claim of $770 million in disgorgement for alleged Section 5 violations in Ripple’s institutional XRP sales. </p> 
<p>This signals a crucial phase in the legal battle, with Ripple gearing up to challenge the SEC’s significant financial claim. This development prompts legal experts to reference the Morrison v. National Australia Bank U.S. Supreme Court <a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/08-1191.ZS.html">case</a>, emphasizing its potential impact on the sovereign rights of foreign nations.&nbsp;</p> 
<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-jeremy-hogan-sees-some-new-spark"><strong>Jeremy Hogan Sees Some New Spark</strong></h2> 
<p>Whereas, lawyer Jeremy Hogan finds the case intriguing, suggesting that Ripple’s sales must have occurred “in the U.S.” or on a U.S. exchange, aligning with the Supreme Court’s stance. The uncertainty lies in how the SEC plans to proceed and whether it might extend its jurisdiction beyond U.S. borders. The prospect of other countries like the UK, France, and Australia filing Amicus Briefs, as witnessed in the Morrison case, adds an intriguing layer to the unfolding legal drama.&nbsp;</p> 
<figure class="wp-block-embed is-type-rich is-provider-twitter wp-block-embed-twitter">
 <div class="wp-block-embed__wrapper"> 
  <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="550" data-dnt="true">
   <p lang="en" dir="ltr">This will be interesting as nothing less is at stake than the sovereign rights of foreign countries.<br><br>The U.S. Supreme Court says that Ripple's sales must've been "in the U.S." or at least on a U.S. exchange. How is the SEC's expert going to get around that? <a href="https://t.co/k3WJYui2YK">https://t.co/k3WJYui2YK</a> <a href="https://t.co/71yLHqDHVJ">pic.twitter.com/71yLHqDHVJ</a></p>— Jeremy Hogan (@attorneyjeremy1) <a href="https://twitter.com/attorneyjeremy1/status/1722720170249015365?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 9, 2023</a>
  </blockquote>
  <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> 
 </div>
</figure> 
<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="strong-some-more-twist-turns-strong"><strong>Some More Twist &amp; Turns…</strong></h2> 
<p>However, lawyer James Farell points out that Judge Torres has already addressed this matter by rejecting Ripple’s argument in the motion to dismiss the SEC v. Ripple lawsuit. Pro-XRP lawyer Bill Morgan chimed in, expressing skepticism about the likelihood of foreign countries intervening, given jurisdictional concerns and the precedent set by SEC v. Govil.&nbsp;</p> 
<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="strong-secs-may-get-disappointed-on-settlement-amount-strong"><strong>SECs May Get Disappointed on Settlement Amount</strong></h2> 
<p>The core debate centers on whether Ripple’s activities had a sufficient nexus with the U.S. to warrant SEC intervention. As both parties engage in discussions, there is speculation about a potential settlement, possibly involving a reduction in the SEC’s requested disgorgement amount. The intricate details and jurisdictional complexities keep the outcome uncertain, with experts closely watching for further developments in this high-stakes legal battle that could have far-reaching implications for the cryptocurrency industry and the application of U.S. securities law.</p> 
<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="strong-what-makes-him-sure-of-the-win-strong"><strong>What Makes Him Sure of the Win?&nbsp;</strong></h2> 
<p>Charting the winning odds of the case, he highlights a legal victory for Binance in the Anderson v. Binance case, which restricted the application of U.S. securities laws outside the United States. He further suggests that this legal precedent could benefit Ripple, indicating a connection between Binance’s case outcome and potential implications for Ripple in its ongoing legal battle. The X post acknowledges the legal intricacies, categorizing the information as “legal nerd stuff.”</p>

Ripple’s Response to SEC Lawsuit: Key Developments and Legal Expert Insights

Table of Contents

CoinPedia News

Other articles published on Nov 11, 2023

Wallet Address

Binance’s Exit Plan from Russia: What You Need to Know

What is SUSHI Coin?

JPMorgan Unveils Programmable Payments with JPM Coin

Bitop Exchange Renews Support for UNHCR Amid Global Refugee Crisis (11 Nov)

Pos

Join our free newsletter for daily crypto updates!