Elon Musk

It’s a bold new world for the millions who once thrived on <a href="https://www.cryptopolitan.com/satoshi-nakamotos-twitter-stirs-five-years/" data-type="post" data-id="378324" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Twitter</a>, now rebranded as X. Those clicks, shares, and witty quips are about to come with a price tag.<a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2023/10/18/x-formerly-twitter-tests-charging-new-users-1-to-tweet-retweet.html" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank"> </a>
If X’s latest announcement is any indication, your engagement on their platform might soon cost you a dollar, to be precise. Now, while a dollar might seem like pocket change to many, the implications of such a move are enormous.
<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Purging the Bots or Pinching the Pockets?</h4>
The whispers in the alleyways of the internet are resounding. X’s newest strategy is apparently to combat the ever-pervasive bot menace.
Their latest initiative, fancily christened “Not A Bot,” is aiming to cut through the swarm of automated spam accounts that seem to flood the platform.
For a while now, bots have been the specter haunting X, making one question the authenticity of online interactions. By introducing a nominal annual fee of $1 for users who wish to post or interact with content, X hopes to deter these unwanted guests.
But the million-dollar question (or perhaps, the one-dollar question) is: Will this be effective? And at what cost?
It’s noteworthy that the fee is planned for a pilot phase in New Zealand and the Philippines before any further global rollout. While X ensures that this isn’t a scheme to boost their profit margins, it’s hard not to view it critically.
The bitter pill to swallow here is that users who opt out of this payment will be relegated to mere spectators, limited to viewing posts and following accounts.
<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Musk’s Murky Reign Over X</h4>
Ever since Elon Musk took the reins of this social media giant last October, the platform has seen a whirlwind of changes. Now, while some might argue that change is the only constant, it’s essential to evaluate the nature of these changes.
Musk was quite vocal about his grievances regarding the bot infestation on the platform, even before his acquisition. The irony, however, is that many critics believe the bot activity has surged during Musk’s tenure.
The list of Musk-induced modifications to X is long and contentious. From overhauling user verification protocols to slashing the trust and safety teams for a leaner budget, the platform is almost unrecognizable.
Some independent researchers even point towards a rise in bots promoting cryptocurrency, adding another layer of suspicion and skepticism.
While X is still a force to reckon with in the social media sphere, especially as an indispensable tool for news and crisis communication, its sheen is undoubtedly tarnishing.
Many loyal users lament the platform’s decline. And although alternatives like Bluesky, Meta’s Threads, and Mastodon are still in their infancy, one wonders if they might soon provide disgruntled X users a new digital home.
Only time will reveal the true implications of X’s new payment strategy. While combating bots is a commendable aim, it remains to be seen if making users pay is the right move.
One thing is clear: The world of social media is evolving, and as users, we must decide if we are willing to pay the price.

Got $1? X plans to make you pay for tweeting or retweeting

Cryptopolitan_News

Other articles published on Oct 18, 2023

Calgarians lost $22.5m due to crypto scams, Canadian police say

MARKETS INSIGHT - VOLATILITY OVERVIEW VOL.6

‘Let’s Not Start BS Season’: Critic Dismisses XRP Integration Misinfo

#1 Crypto AI Project? EARLY BUYING OPPORTUNITY

Fidelity Updates its Spot Bitcoin ETF Filing: Why Was This Update Made?

Coinbase selects Germany as a key regional talent hub amid the growing shift of web3 firms from t...

Join our free newsletter for daily crypto updates!