Biden

Hope

The clock is ticking, and America’s on the line. Picture this – an emboldened Russia making strategic plays in Eastern Europe, and a rapidly militarizing <a href="https://www.cryptopolitan.com/china-advances-digital-yuan-development-industrial-park-shenzhen/" data-type="post" data-id="385137" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">China</a>, edging ever so close to Taiwan.<a href="https://www.reuters.com/world/us-must-be-ready-simultaneous-wars-with-china-russia-report-says-2023-10-12/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank"> </a>
This isn’t some dystopian novel or a plot from a Cold War reboot movie. It’s the reality we’re steering into. The U.S. has to ramp up its defenses now, and here’s why.
<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="russia-and-china-a-potential-dual-threat">Russia and China: A Potential Dual Threat</h2>
Our global supremacy is being tested. When we’re talking about international giants like Russia and China, we’re not just talking about countries with sizable populations and economies.
We’re talking about nations with robust military infrastructure and, more worryingly, nuclear capabilities. These nations aren’t just flexing their muscles for show.
Russia’s recent ventures into Ukraine send a crystal-clear message, and China’s territorial ambitions around Taiwan have been an open secret.
Here’s the chilling part – there’s growing unease about whether Russia and China might be considering a strategic partnership. Let’s not dance around the issue.
A two-pronged assault from these two behemoths? It’s an alarming scenario, even if we don’t have concrete proof of their nuclear collaboration.
<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="re-strategizing-the-defense-playbook">Re-Strategizing the Defense Playbook</h2>
The way we’ve structured our defense has always been about tackling one war, while simultaneously keeping another potential aggressor at bay.
That approach? Well, it’s obsolete. We’re potentially looking at a two-front conflict that might stretch our resources thin. So, what do we do? Hope that it won’t happen? Hope has never been a strategy.
The Strategic Posture Commission, which consists of an equal mix of Democrats and Republicans, has painted a dire picture for the unprepared.
Their takeaway is lucid: the U.S. needs to bolster its conventional forces, realign its alliances, and step up its nuclear modernization. They’re not just raising an alarm – they’re handing us the fire extinguisher and telling us where the exits are.
Sure, this implies hiking the defense budget, which is a contentious issue, especially in the Congress. But, as the Democratic chair Madelyn Creedon and the vice-chair Jon Kyl have underlined in their report, the country needs these investments.
This isn’t about flexing our military muscles, it’s about safeguarding our national interests. And if that means driving home the gravity of the situation to every American, then that’s the play we need to make.
<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="redefining-nuclear-dominance">Redefining Nuclear Dominance</h2>
President Joe Biden and the current administration believe that our present nuclear arsenal can hold off combined forces from Russia and China.
The Arms Control Association, an advocacy group, echoes this sentiment, stressing that our nuclear stockpile is more than enough for deterrence.
However, this might be a gross underestimation. The Strategic Posture Commission is sounding the alarm, emphasizing that the U.S. and its allies need to be primed to stave off simultaneous threats from both nations.
If the predictions hold, by 2035, China will amass a staggering 1,500 nuclear warheads, positioning itself as a formidable nuclear rival to the U.S. – the first of its kind.
With this looming threat, our defense strategies need an overhaul. For starters, we need to ensure the successful funding and implementation of the 30-year U.S. nuclear arms modernization program initiated in 2010.
This calls for upgrading all warheads, delivery mechanisms, and the overall defense infrastructure, right on schedule. But we must go further – consider the deployment of more tactical nuclear assets in strategic locations in Asia and Europe.
Additionally, it’s crucial to invest in advanced defense tools like the B-21 stealth bombers and the new Columbia-class nuclear submarines.
We’re at a pivotal point. While we’re not actively endorsing a militant stance, preparedness is paramount. The timeline for the dual threats from Russia and China is 2027-2035.
The clock’s ticking, and decisions need to be swift. Failing to act might put the U.S. in a position of increased reliance on its nuclear arsenal. The message is clear – U.S., prepare for two wars now, or else.

U.S. has to prepare for two wars now, or else

Table of Contents

Cryptopolitan_News

Other articles published on Oct 13, 2023

GameStop Stock Price Analysis: Will GME Stock Price Defend $15?

Tencent launches credit solution for digital yuan

Grayscale’s Bitcoin ETF Showdown: SEC’s Midnight Deadline Looms

CEO of Alameda Research Exposes Deceit Behind FTX's 2022 Collapse

Corporate Investors Might Be Accumulating Bitcoin Again: Here Are the Details!

TON Network Poised to Set a New World Record for Fastest Blockchain

Join our free newsletter for daily crypto updates!