<p>The National Assembly Research Service (NARS) of South Korea last Friday <a href="https://www.nars.go.kr/report/view.do?cmsCode&#61;CM0043&amp;brdSeq&#61;42922" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">issued a report</a> emphasizing the need to broaden the scope of the country’s blind trust system for public officials. Currently, this system primarily covers traditional stocks, but the report highlights the necessity of extending its coverage to include cryptocurrencies.</p><h2 id="header-0">Public Service Ethics Act</h2><p>Under the existing Public Service Ethics Act, public officials holding a rank of 4 or higher within the finance department of the Ministry of Economy and Finance and the Financial Services Commission are mandated to either divest themselves of stocks linked to their official duties and responsibilities or transfer them into a blind trust if the total value of these stocks exceeds KRW 30 million (about $23,000).</p><h2 id="header-1">Blind trust</h2><p>A blind trust is a mechanism through which a public official transfers their stock holdings to a trustee. Subsequently, the trustee handles these entrusted stocks by exchanging them for other assets and overseeing their management, administration, and disposition. Importantly, the original owner of the stock, who is the public official, is barred from participating in these aspects of the trust and is also kept uninformed about the trust property’s status or details.</p><h2 id="header-2">Debate over expansion</h2><p>The current policy confines the blind trust framework exclusively to stocks. Nevertheless, there is an ongoing debate advocating for the inclusion of other assets, such as virtual assets and real estate, within its scope. The rationale behind this argument is that these types of assets can also potentially give rise to conflicts of interest. However, counterarguments have been raised, expressing concerns that extending the blind trust to these assets could excessively limit the property rights of public officials. Consequently, as of now, this broader application has not been implemented.</p><p>Comparison with the US</p><p>The Korean blind trust system was inspired by the United States’ Ethics in Government Act of 1978, which does not limit the types of assets that can be included in a blind trust. In the US, a blind trust can encompass not only stocks but also bonds, mutual funds, virtual assets, and real estate. In light of this, the report recommends the expansion of the blind trust system to encompass virtual assets and real estate. This step is proposed to prevent conflicts of interest among public officials pertaining to a wider array of asset types.</p><h2 id="header-3">Enhancing trustee discretion</h2><p>Meanwhile, NARS also argued for broadening the trustee’s discretion in trust management to render the system more reasonable. This stems from the concern that the existing uniform property sale approach could lead public servants to incur losses. NARS has proposed potential solutions, such as extending the time limit for property sales or mandating the sale of only a portion of the assets, as viable options to address this issue.</p>

Korea’s Legislative Research Body Suggests Expanding Blind Trust System to Include Crypto

Table of Contents

CoinNess Global

Other articles published on Sep 20, 2023

Beosin Unveils EagleEye: Enhancing Web3 Security

India Rises to Second-Largest Global Crypto Market Despite High Taxes

Salesforce Stock Forecast: Will (NYSE: CRM) Descend or Rebound?

Singapore police report higher total involved in money laundering case

Binance CEO disputes media report of $250 million loan

Nomura's Laser Digital Subsidiary Unveils Bitcoin Fund for Institutional Investors

Join our free newsletter for daily crypto updates!