United

Biden

April

The United States is currently investigating the possibility of coordinated<a href="https://financialservices.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=408737" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank"> </a>efforts by federal agencies to deny banking services to digital asset firms and related entities. 



This comes after lawmakers from the House Financial Services Committee and two subcommittees sent letters to key financial regulators requesting information on their actions and agendas toward the digital <a href="https://www.cryptopolitan.com/polygon-game-changing-bridge-for-zkevm/" data-type="post" data-id="296128">asset</a> ecosystem.



<h2 id="revival-of-coordinated-actions-in-the-united-states">Revival of coordinated actions in the United States?</h2>



In the past, the Obama administration coordinated actions to curtail areas of commerce it deemed objectionable, relying on the concept of &#8216;reputational risk.&#8217; 



Regulators pressured financial institutions to deny services to customers or terminate existing relationships, targeting industries such as gun dealers, pawn shops, tobacco stores, and payday lenders. 



Today, lawmakers are concerned that federal prudential regulators are attempting to suppress innovation in the United States by discouraging banks from providing services to digital asset firms and related entities.



<h2 id="examples-of-regulatory-pressure-on-the-digital-asset-ecosystem">Examples of Regulatory Pressure on the Digital Asset Ecosystem</h2>



Since 2021, there have been several instances of regulators taking steps that seemingly discourage banks from providing services to digital asset firms. 



The Biden administration, for instance, stopped a rule designed to prevent improper activity in this area. In November 2021, the OCC issued guidance urging banks to provide services related to digital assets only if they could assure regulators in writing that they could do so in a &#8220;safe and sound manner.&#8221; 



The FDIC, in April 2022, directed all FDIC-supervised institutions to provide written notice of their intent to engage in or with digital asset-related activities.



Lawmakers argue that digital asset activity is not inherently risky and that recent events involving FTX, Silicon Valley Bank, and Signature Bank were not caused by digital asset-related customers. 



They believe that the actions of the Fed, FDIC, and OCC do not appear to be in reaction to recent events or the result of a sudden desire to protect financial institutions from risky behavior, but instead suggest a coordinated strategy to debank the digital asset ecosystem in the United States.



The investigation into crypto debanking highlights the increasing scrutiny of the digital asset industry and raises concerns about the potential impact of regulatory pressure on innovation within the sector.

The United States is investigating crypto debanking

Table of Contents

Cryptopolitan_News

Other articles published on Apr 27, 2023

XRP at Crossroads, is $0.5 Coming or is Another Drop Imminent? (Ripple Price Analysis)

Koto Crypto Launches Instant Crypto OTC Desk in Dubai, Embracing UAE Friendly Regulations

Binance CEO CZ Lawyers Up as US Pressure Intensifies

Missed Bitcoin Cash (BCH)? Meet Sparklo, The Next Big Thing

Dymension Launches IBC-Enabled EVM Rollup on Testnet to Enhance Cosmos Ecosystem

Former OKX CEO Jay Hao Joins Sensorium Expert Advisory Board

Join our free newsletter for daily crypto updates!