Pump.fun's PUMP rose 17.6% over seven days to $0.00633 as of 12:35 p.m. ET Monday, while Meteora's MET fell 13.9% to $0.29.
Pump.fun currently allocates half its revenue to buying and burning PUMP. Its dashboard lists $474.8 million in cumulative buybacks, though Pump.fun says the figure does not yet correctly reflect custom-pair activity.
Meteora buys back MET at its own discretion, and Blockworks Research says making those buybacks programmatic could prompt the market to revalue the token.
Solana launchpad Pump.fun's token (
PUMP) rose about 18% over the past week, while trading venue Meteora's token (
MET) fell 14%. Meteora's own trading volume grew almost 50% in September.
The two
tokens return different amounts of their platforms' revenue to holders. Pump.fun spends a fixed share of what it earns buying PUMP and destroying it, while Meteora's buybacks are discretionary. That difference may explain part of MET's discount to its rivals, Blockworks Research analyst Kunal Doshi wrote on Monday. Automatic buybacks are the step he says could change it.
Pump.fun states its policy plainly on its token page.
"Half of every dollar Pump.fun earns buys $PUMP on the open market, then burns it forever," the company
says.
Pump.fun’s dashboard lists $474.8 million in cumulative buybacks and burns, equal to about 17% of total supply, though the company warns that the figures do not yet correctly reflect custom-pair activity.
A burn sends tokens to an address no one can spend from, which removes them from supply for good.
The buying is also tied to new activity. Agency, a launchpad for AI agent tokens, generated about $760,000 in fees on Saturday, and almost half went to PUMP, Doshi
found. That flow "could explain the rally," he wrote.
Raydium (
RAY) runs a smaller program. It sends 12% of trading fees to RAY buybacks and holds the tokens rather than burning them, its
documentation states. RAY edged higher this week.
Solana (
SOL) decentralized
exchanges handled $78.3 billion in trading in September, up 20% from August, DefiLlama
data show.
"The long term activity trend is becoming hard to ignore," Blockworks Research's Sam Schubert
wrote on X.
Meteora took a growing share of that trading. Its main product, DLMM, lets
liquidity providers choose the price ranges where their funds trade. On Fomo, a fast-growing Solana trading app, Meteora handled more than twice Raydium's share of
memecoin volume, Doshi
found.
MET's market value is about three times Meteora's annualized revenue on DefiLlama figures. PUMP trades at about five times and RAY at about six. Doshi puts Meteora's revenue higher, which would make MET cheaper still.
Meteora sends part of its DLMM revenue to MET
staking rewards, Doshi wrote, and he called the criticism of its value accrual "overstated." Traders also
rotated into DeFi tokens that share revenue last week.
Buybacks carry their own risk. Most programs are funded from treasuries rather than recurring revenue and spend more at market peaks, according to Keyrock
research.
Meteora plans to share details of a new version of DLMM at Solana Summit Singapore on Tuesday, it
said on X.
MET would need to rise about 50% to trade at PUMP's multiple of revenue, on DefiLlama figures.
"If value accrual is the concern, a single announcement making buybacks programmatic could be all it takes to spark a rerating," Doshi wrote.
This article contains links to third-party websites or other content for information purposes only (“Third-Party Sites”). The Third-Party Sites are not under the control of CoinMarketCap, and CoinMarketCap is not responsible for the content of any Third-Party Site, including without limitation any link contained in a Third-Party Site, or any changes or updates to a Third-Party Site. CoinMarketCap is providing these links to you only as a convenience, and the inclusion of any link does not imply endorsement, approval or recommendation by CoinMarketCap of the site or any association with its operators. This article is intended to be used and must be used for informational purposes only. It is important to do your own research and analysis before making any material decisions related to any of the products or services described. This article is not intended as, and shall not be construed as, financial advice. The views and opinions expressed in this article are the author’s [company’s] own and do not necessarily reflect those of CoinMarketCap.