Ethereum

Foundation

<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://coinpedia.org/news/hinman-eth-analysis-reshaping-the-xrp-case-judge-torres-approach-and-implications/">Hinman ETH Analysis Reshaping the XRP Case: Judge Torres’ Approach and Implications</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://coinpedia.org">Coinpedia Fintech News</a></p> 
<p>The intriguing complexities of the ongoing legal battle between the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Ripple Labs have captured the attention of the global crypto sphere. In recent discussions on social media, commentators have considered the possible impact of former SEC director Bill Hinman’s approach to Ethereum on the Ripple case.</p> 
<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="strong-ripple-case-mired-in-intrigue-and-speculation-strong"><strong>Ripple Case Mired in Intrigue and Speculation</strong></h2> 
<p>A blockchain specialist going by the moniker ‘Mr. Huber’ <a href="https://twitter.com/Leerzeit/status/1673397639918788624?s=20">responded</a> to a tweet questioning the relevance of Hinman’s viewpoint on Ethereum to the evidence stacked against Ripple. Mr. Huber outlined two potential scenarios:</p> 
<ul> 
 <li>Firstly, if Judge Analisa Torres concludes that Hinman legally exempted Ethereum from being classified as a security, then it’s likely that the same logic would be applied to Ripple’s XRP. Intriguingly, Hinman’s Ethereum analysis did not factor in the scale or transparency of the holdings, which could mean XRP was not marketed as security and thus incurs no penalties.</li> 
 <li>The second scenario considers that if Judge Torres deems that Hinman’s exclusion of Ethereum as a security was unlawful, yet a rational individual could have believed that XRP would be governed by similar regulations based on Hinman’s public stance, XRP might have been sold as a security, but without proper notice, leading again to no penalties.</li> 
</ul> 
<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-controversy-surrounding-bill-hinman-s-role"><strong>Controversy Surrounding Bill Hinman’s Role</strong></h2> 
<p>Attorney Bill Morgan has floated a more controversial theory around the Hinman-Ethereum dynamic, suggesting that Hinman may have been financially influenced by the Ethereum Foundation or an associated entity to present a lenient stance on Ethereum. According to Morgan, this could explain why Ethereum was seemingly given a free pass in the ongoing regulatory scrutiny faced by cryptocurrency.</p> 
<p>As speculations continue to swirl, all eyes are now on the Ripple-SEC saga, with crypto-enthusiasts across the globe eager to see how Hinman’s perspective on Ethereum might influence the final verdict for XRP.</p>

Hinman ETH Analysis Reshaping the XRP Case: Judge Torres’ Approach and Implications

Table of Contents

CoinPedia News

Další články publikované 27. 6. 2023

OKX Liquid Marketplace Launches 'Nitro Spreads' Enabling One-Click Basis Trading for Institutiona...

Bitcoin’s correlation with Nasdaq 100 hits a three-year low as it charts an independent path

WW2 Supply Chain Model: A New Strategy for Bitcoin Miners

Three Arrows Capital Liquidators Seek a Staggering $1.3B from Founders of Insolvent Hedge Fund

101 Million SHIB Burned As Shytoshi Kusama Likens Shiba Inu to Bitcoin (BTC)

Introducing DIFI Market: The Decentralized Multi-Shop Ecommerce Platform on CORE Blockchain

Join our free newsletter for daily crypto updates!