The crypto industry is exploding with excitement and innovation, but for every genuine gamechanger, there are dozens of duds, failures and false-starters.
The cryptocurrency industry is exploding with excitement and innovation, and there are now dozens of potentially groundbreaking platforms and projects that leverage the properties of blockchain technology.
But for every genuine gamechanger, there are dozens of duds, failures and false-starters.
Unfortunately, newer participants and investors often get the short side of the stick and some can fall victim to deceptive and overhyped projects.
But by developing a more robust understanding of the crypto landscape and its nuances can one reliably avoid the mistakes and navigate the traps that newbies often fall victim to.
Here, we take a look at some of the most common ways weak or deceptive crypto projects often dupe noobs.
Massive Supply Inflation
While most established projects inflate at a reasonable rate — with the top 10 POS networks inflating at an average of 7.7% per year, some inflate at an enormous rate, causing a massive disbalance between supply and demand that can crush the token’s value.
This often leads to a characteristic chart pattern, with an immediate pump followed by a near-perpetual crash as inflation crushes demand.
Unfortunately, many new projects use a combination of marketing tactics to fuel an initial wave of hype around the token. This is almost invariably short-lived, with the hype eventually giving way to massive selling pressure as early-stage and in-profit investors look to exit their positions.
Early Bird Pricing
The vast majority of projects are either entirely or almost entirely funded by early-stage investors, which can include VCs, angel investors, exchange partners, incubators and other types of funds.
In most cases, a large proportion of the token supply is sold to early-stage investors at a huge discount to the public price. Prior to launch, projects often sell a small fraction of the supply to public sale participants who are often expected to help market the project by promoting it to their friends and family.
It isn’t uncommon for early-stage investors to receive a more than 70% discount compared to public buyers.
Though some projects are forthcoming about the discount early investors receive, others obfuscate the prices that seed and private sale investors paid for their tokens, making it difficult to see the markup public participants face.
That said, it should be noted that many higher-quality projects are selective about who can participate in their earliest raises — generally favoring value-adding investors, i.e. those that can assist with growth, marketing, user acquisition, development, etc.
In this case, the discount may be justified.
The Airdrop Scam
The way it works is simple, a typically bogus project will automatically distribute a large number of tokens to a randomly selected list of recipients — usually based on their most recent activity, cryptocurrency holdings, or whether they’ve been targeted before or not.
The scammer will usually have set up a liquidity pool and some simulated trades to make it appear that the token is highly liquid and that the airdrop is worth a princely sum.
In most cases, the token name will contain a reference to a website, where users will usually find that they need to connect their wallets to unlock their tokens for trading. This might lead to any number of potential scams or hacks, where the user might hand over their identity details or approve token transfers — leading to their wallets being emptied.
Market Maker Manipulation
In many cases, market makers are instructed to help maintain the price within a specific range, buying up tokens when the price goes too low, and selling them when it goes too high.
This can be used to ensure the sustainable growth of the token, but can also be used to print signs of strength on the charts such as a bull flag or other bullish continuation patterns — potentially duping investors into entering the market.
But this is often short-lived since many projects only have the funds to hire market makers for a short time, following which the token continues its natural trajectory — which is often negative.
This is a particular problem for newly launched tokens since market maker activity can obscure the natural price action, making it unclear whether the token is a genuinely attractive investment.
With this in mind, newbies should pay more attention to the fundamentals of a project, rather than its short-term price action when it appears that it’s working with a market maker.