CoinMarkeCap breaks down some of the benefits and features of each of the top coins.
The competition between layer ones has been raging since the frenzy around various decentralized applications (DApps) and non-fungible tokens (NFTs) in 2021. While the 2020 DeFi summer hinged on Ethereum as the primary driver, 2021 saw the rise of other layer-one protocols like Solana that promised higher transaction speeds at lower costs — something that Ethereum aims to achieve using its Ethereum 2.0 upgrade.
While the two blockchains have certainly found their fair share of fans and supporters, Ethereum reigns supreme as a blockchain that offers a much more transparent and advanced ecosystem of DApps. But, there are certainly differences between the two that cannot be ignored.
In this article, we will look at the major differences between the two blockchains. We will be reviewing the underlying technology, the core features that each blockchain offers and also understand the growing DApp ecosystem on each.
Let's dive in.
Under the Hood
One of the key factors that separates Ethereum from Solana is the underlying technology. Each has a different consensus mechanism at its heart and each has unique ways of solving the problems around scaling. In this section, we will look at how the two are different from the perspective of what's driving the two blockchains.
Join us in showcasing the cryptocurrency revolution, one newsletter at a time. Subscribe now to get daily news and market updates right to your inbox, along with our millions of other subscribers (that’s right, millions love us!) — what are you waiting for?
Ethereum 1.0 (the one we are using presently) relies on a Proof-of-Work (PoW) mechanism, the same as the mechanism that is used by Bitcoin's blockchain. The network, then, is secured by hundreds of thousands (if not millions) of miners who participate in the process of consensus by “staking” their computing power/hardware. While this ensures that the network always remains decentralized and the barrier to entry to participating within the network is high, it also leads to reduced performance on the network as it is unable to process many transactions per second.
The second point that makes Ethereum different from Solana is its "stateful" nature. It means that all the transactions on the network are recorded into one state and if any new transaction occurs, then the entire network (or all the miners) must update their copy of the network to reflect that new transaction. In simple terms, if Alice were to send Bob $10 via Ethereum, then the entire network of miners (which for the sake of assumption are 10,000) around the world will have to update their records to reflect that.
This process is not cheap, and this is why Ethereum 1.0 is considered to be slower than other ‘stateless’ blockchains like Solana.
The other key difference with Ethereum is that Solana has a ‘stateless’ architecture and, as already discussed above, this helps reduce the overall memory consumption. Since the entire state of the network does not need updating for each transaction, they can be easily carried out sequentially. This is one of the factors that make Solana highly scalable.
Each blockchain has some incredible features that set it apart. While decentralization is certainly something that Ethereum has always focused on, higher throughput has remained Solana's focus and has managed to achieve that via its underlying technology as well.
A crucial selling point for Solana is certainly its ability to process a block every 400 milliseconds and its record 60k transactions per second. Just these features alone make it one of the fastest performing layer-one blockchains. Additionally, it has several features that makes it stand apart.
Improved Transaction Speeds
In addition to this, Solana also utilizes what is known as the Gulf Stream that is, as it claims, a mempool-less transaction forwarding standard that pushes the transactions to the edge of the network. This enables network validators to carry out transactions much ahead of the stipulated time. This enables the network to process over 50,000 transactions per second (TPS).
A crucial feature that makes Solana stand apart from its competitors is that the blockchain is scalable at its base level, that is, it does not require layer-two solutions to increase scale. A key component of the blockchain that aids in this scalability is the Turbine block propagation protocol. It helps break down data into smaller fragments, making it easy to transfer it across the network. Sealevel also aids in the processing of transactions across GPUs and SSDs.
All of these features combined make for a highly scalable, efficient and low-fee blockchain.
While Ethereum is limited by its ability to process a huge number of transactions per second, where it stands out is decentralization. The barrier to entry to become a validator — especially in Ethereum — is not too high, which makes for a trustless decentralized network. To compensate for the lack of scaling features at the native blockchain, layer-two solutions help provide for advanced scalability and throughput.
A key feature of Ethereum, especially when it was launched, was the fact that it is a Turing-complete language. This means that it can support a variation in programmability, which further facilitates the creation of different smart contracts. It, thus, utilizes Solidity as its base programming language which is used for coding smart contracts.
Needless to say, Ethereum was one of the first pioneers in the creation of decentralized on-chain smart contracts.
Ethereum 1.0 can process roughly 13-15 transactions per second, which does not make it the fastest blockchain. What the layer-one blockchain of Ethereum lacks in scalability is accomplished by layer-two scaling solutions such as state channels, sidechains, Plasma (Polygon), Validium and rollups (Optimism). It also supports multi-chain networks that help enhance the scalability for Ethereum without compromising on its security. An example of this is Polygon, which is a multi-chain network that helps scale Ethereum.
Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs)
Certainly not the first to pioneer non-fungible tokens, Ethereum was one of the major protocols that helped leverage the technology to create digitally scarce collectibles. While the collectibles boom has only happened in the year 2021, NFTs were being used for various different purposes even before. The first application that gained worldwide popularity was Cryptokitties, which also led to the clogging of the Ethereum network at the time.
Stablecoins are the engine of decentralized finance (DeFi). Think of them as normal currencies like USD with the only difference being that stablecoins are cryptocurrencies and they represent one unit of traditional fiat currency — a cryptocurrency that is pegged to a fiat currency. Since all major cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile, it makes sense to have a type that remains pegged to one unit of a traditional fiat currency. Stablecoins do a perfect job in achieving that.
The DeFi ecosystem is quite diverse on Ethereum, namely because it is a much older blockchain than Solana. The latter, on the other hand, has launched several different marketing strategies (hackathons, bug bounty programs) to invite more users and developers to its network. These tactics have certainly helped the protocol add more users and developers since its inception.
The first DApp that comes to mind when talking about the DeFi ecosystem on Ethereum is Sushi. It is one of the biggest order book-less peer-to-peer cryptocurrency exchanges that aims to offer users the ability to buy/sell their preferred tokens easily. It has seen a tremendous performance since its inception in September 2020.
Caption: Sushi Performance, Source
Sushi isn't the only one. In fact, Compound was one of the main drivers behind the DeFi summer of 2020. It is a lending platform on Ethereum that saw tremendous increases rise in its borrowing volume.
Caption: Compound Borrowing Volume, Source
These are just two DApps on the Ethereum ecosystem. The year 2021 also saw an incremental rise in the trading volume on various NFT projects on the ecosystem. Several major art galleries like Sotheby's also joined in on the fun by listing works of major (and some lesser known) artists as NFTs.
Caption: NFT Sales in 2021, Source
The DeFi ecosystem on Solana is still at a very nascent stage, with various DApps being launched on the platform as we speak. This is the result of extensive hackathons and other marketing strategies that the network has employed to attract a wide user base. The blockchain itself has acquired over $12B in total value locked (TVL) across all its DApps.
Caption: TVL on Solana, Source
One of the biggest DApps on Solana is Raydium, an on-chain order book AMM that helps users execute trades. Since its launch in April of 2021, it has managed to amass over $1.8B.
Caption: TVL on Raydium, Source
The ecosystem is still growing given that the blockchain is still new. A rather unfamiliar correlation between Solana and Ethereum is that whenever there is seemingly a rise in Ethereum’s gas fees, the number of users on Solana increase.
This is obviously pure conjecture and should be taken as such. There are several other factors for the rise in the number of users on Solana. For instance, Mango Markets (a decentralized exchange for leverage trading on Solana) managed to go from $28M to over $130M in less than a month.
Caption: TVL on Mango Markets, Source
While the reasons behind the rise in the number of users could be aplenty, one thing is for certain: The DeFi ecosystem on Ethereum currently looks more vast and offers a much wider variety of applications.
How are Ethereum and Solana different?
Ethereum and Solana differ in terms of the underlying technology and consensus mechanism that they utilize. While Ethereum currently follows PoW, Solana follows PoH. Ethereum was launched in 2014 and Solana was launched in 2020. Ethereum offers a much more mature and decentralized network, while Solana offers high-speed and low-cost transactions.
Which is better: Ethereum or Solana?
Ethereum offers a mature and much more developed DeFi ecosystem. Also, because of the protocol’s age, it has gone through various forks and changes, all while remaining decentralized. Solana is a new kid on the block that offers faster transaction times at lower costs.
Which is faster: Ethereum or Solana?
At the moment, Solana can process over 50K transactions per second (TPS). Ethereum is progressing to Ethereum 2.0 and once that upgrade is finished, it will be able to process over 100K TPS.
Which is more popular: Ethereum or Solana?
Ethereum currently stands at a market cap of $497B, while Solana is at a mere $56B. Due to the faster transaction speeds, Solana certainly has found a dedicated set of community members. However, Ethereum is a mature blockchain protocol that has acquired billions of dollars in TVL across its DeFi ecosystem.
The Bottom Line
Ethereum has certainly managed to acquire some really dedicated community members who are quite certain that the protocol is bound to succeed. Since it has played a pivotal role in being the backbone of DeFi, it has its own value in the community which cannot be replaced. Solana is the “new kid on the block” that is still finding strong footing despite its hockey-stick growth. It is hard to tell which blockchain wins in the longer term but given that Ethereum has been in the game for so long, it has much higher chances.