A federal judge ruled that plaintiffs suing celebrity promoters of EMAX, which had lost 99.8% of its value, had not proven they saw and were influenced by the promotions.
Listen to the CoinMarketRecap podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify and Google Podcasts
A federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit against reality TV star KIm Kardashian and several other celebrities over a cryptocurrency promotion.
U.S. District Judge Michael Fitzgerald tossed the lawsuit over the 2021 promotion of the EthereumMax token, which crashed after being pushed up by a series of star-studded endorsements. He ruled that it was not clear that the plaintiffs actually saw those promotions.
The judge added that the plaintiffs also failed to show that the endorsers intended to mislead other investors, rather than simply acting in their own best interests.
Interestingly, the judge also said California's consumer protection law did not apply to cryptocurrencies, Reuters reported. Fitzgerald said the law only applied to tangible goods and services, not "intangible goods" like cryptocurrencies.
The ruling came two months after Kardashian agreed to a $1.26 million fine to settle a lawsuit by the Securities and Exchange Commission which accused her of failing to properly disclose that she had been paid to endorse EthereumMax.
Despite the name, EthereumMax is not affiliated with Ethereum, the world's second-largest cryptocurrency.
While Kardashian's Instagram post — which began "ARE YOU GUYS INTO CRYPTO????" — did include "#ad" as the seventh of seven hashtags, securities law requires promoters to disclose not just that they were paid, but how much.
An attorney for the plaintiffs said they plan to refile the lawsuit, adding "a host of additional facts demonstrating defendants' wrongdoing and liability."
It's not the only example of celebrities being sued by disgruntled crypto investors lately.