Ethereum

Rocket

DeFi

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has moved to sue ConsenSys, a leading Ethereum software firm with MetaMask Wallet on the front line. The case was filed in the Eastern District of New York, alleging that MetaMask acted as an unregistered securities broker and provided services involving securities in the form of staking. 
This legal challenge adds a significant layer of scrutiny to the firm just weeks after prior investigations concerning its activities were reportedly concluded. 
Details of the SEC’s Claims 
The SEC <a href="https://www.docdroid.com/YS1DSF5/sec-v-consensys-pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">stated</a> that MetaMask did not register as a broker and is involved in the selling and offering to facilitate transactions in investment contracts through staking services with Lido and Rocket Pool. These contracts involve investors staking ETH in return for tokens (stETH and rETH) representing their pro-rata interests in the staking pools operated by Lido and Rocket Pool on blockchain networks like Ethereum.&nbsp; 
According to the SEC complaint, Consensys solicited potential investors, presented itself as a platform for buying and selling these investment contracts, and provided recommendations on which contract (Lido or Rocket Pool) offered potentially higher rewards. Upon investor instruction, Consensys executed these transactions on behalf of investors through its MetaMask Staking software. 
Specifically, the process involved Consensys managing investors’ assets by transferring ETH from their MetaMask wallets to the MM Staking Router Smart Contract. Subsequently, these funds were directed to the proxy smart contracts maintained by Lido or Rocket Pool. Upon completion of the staking process, Consensys facilitated the transfer of newly acquired tokens (stETH or rETH) back into investors’ MetaMask Wallets. 
Per the SEC these services are deemed investment contracts and thus fall under the category of unregistered securities. Sec asserts that&nbsp; 
This lawsuit surfaced just after the SEC <a href="https://consensys.io/blog/sec-closes-ethereum-2-0-investigation-will-not-pursue-ethereum-enforcement" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">concluded</a> separate investigations into ConsenSys’ activities related to Ethereum, highlighting ongoing regulatory scrutiny. 
Financial Implications for ConsenSys 
The SEC’s filings reveal that ConsenSys has amassed over $250 million in fees from these operations, underscoring the financial scale at which MetaMask has been operating. The lawsuit marks a turn in the regulatory landscape for crypto firms, especially following a period of apparent reprieve when ConsenSys received letters from the SEC, which did not specifically mention MetaMask. 
This legal development could set a precedent for other crypto wallets and staking services, signaling increased regulatory intervention in the DeFi sector. As ConsenSys navigates this challenge, the entire cryptocurrency community watches closely, anticipating potential ripple effects that could reshape compliance and operational strategies across the industry. 
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow"> 
 Also Read: <a href="https://www.cryptotimes.io/2024/06/27/coinbase-sues-sec-and-fdic-over-foia-noncompliance/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Coinbase Sues SEC and FDIC Over FOIA Noncompliance</a> 
</blockquote>

SEC Files Lawsuit Against ConsenSys Over MetaMask Staking

The Crypto Times

Andra artiklar publicerade 28 juni 2024

Seven Biggest Hacking Attempts of 2024 in Crypto

Why is TARS Protocol (TAI) AI Crypto Price Pumping?

Indian Police Busted $16 Million in Max Crypto Trading Scam

Ethereum's Repeated Rally During US Market Open Hours Sparks Interest

Unlock 10x Gains: Invest in This Mid-Cap Token Now

Altcoin Experts Buying TODAY! These Altcoins Will Outperform Market This Summer

Prenumerera på vårt nyhetsbrev och få kryptouppdateringar varje dag!