Facebook changes its name to Meta, and then a string of stories about a digital land rush begin. Investors were buying up plots of land <a href="https://www.wired.com/story/what-is-the-metaverse/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">in cyberspace</a>, sometimes for millions of dollars, seemingly convinced there must be gold in them thar metaverse hills. And if so many people with so much money were rushing it, it must be because there’s a profit to be made. Right?However, the language that we’ve been using to discuss this new phase of technology—describing it in terms of a singular metaverse with finite space to develop—has helped conceal a reality that more closely resembles early-access video games and common pump-and-dump schemes.The NarrativeIt’s only been a couple months since Facebook’s rebrand, but it’s hard to overstate how much it’s already driven the conversation about “the metaverse.” For starters, nearly everyone describes it as the metaverse—when the reality is that there is no singular metaverse in the sense that we talk about “the internet.” Services like Meta’s <a href="https://www.oculus.com/facebook-horizon/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Horizon Worlds</a> and Microsoft’s Mesh don’t interact with each other, they’re just separate VR apps.<h2 id="header-0">The issue</h2>The problem with this language quirk is that it can give the impression that, for example, if a company says their VR app, video game, or social platform is part of “the metaverse,” then that specific app must be where this nebulous future is going to happen. Which is a bit like saying that augmented reality is the future, and <a href="https://www.wired.com/2013/12/glasshole/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Google Glass</a> is an AR product, therefore Google Glass is the future.Under this implicit framing, stories published everywhere from crypto-enthusiast sites to <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/metaverse-land-sales-valuations-republic-realm-metaverse-group-crypto-2021-12?amp&#61;" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Business Insider</a> and <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2021/11/30/business/metaverse-real-estate.html" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">The New York Times</a>, have touted a “virtual land boom,” highlighting the $2.4 million sale of a 116-parcel estate in Decentraland, as investors pour millions of dollars into virtual locations. In these articles, executives from Metaverse Group, a self-described “virtual real estate” company, described buying plots of land in “the metaverse” as akin to buying property in Manhattan long before the city developed.More precisely, platforms like Decentraland or the Sandbox sell NFT-based tokens that point to sections of a map in their specific virtual worlds, but those spaces don’t cross over. As Dan Olson, a video essayist who has extensively covered online social experiences and movements, from <a href="https://youtu.be/dPHPNgIihR0" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Fortnite’s digital concerts</a> to <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v&#61;JTfhYyTuT44" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">flat earth and QAnon</a>, and is currently researching the crypto sphere, explained, “They’re selling their tokens that give you permission to build within their space. So you’re effectively buying into their service.”In other words, buying “real estate” on these platforms is like buying property in Manhattan, but in a world where anyone could feasibly create an infinite amount of alternative Manhattans that are just as easy to get to. Which means the only reason for users to buy into this Manhattan is if it offers a better service than the others.In most respects, these platforms resemble your average video game. You control a customizable 3D avatar with your mouse and keyboard (no VR or AR here) and navigate a virtual environment. The debate over whether a virtual social world counts as a video game is <a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna17538999" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">as old as Second Life</a>, but whatever you call them, the primary novel innovation in them is the use of NFTs and cryptocurrencies.Decentraland’s pitch is that using NFTs makes land in its gameworld scarce and, thus, valuable. You can own part of the land, which will increase in value as demand for the space increases, at which point you can sell it. Alternatively, you can rent out space on your property to brands that want to advertise, host events and get a cut of the sales, or open up a shop and sell digital items to users.Read the full article: <a href="https://nftandgamefi.com/2021/12/28/is-metaverse-land-rush-fake-and-are-all-metaverses-the-same/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Is metaverse land rush fake and are all metaverses the same?</a>

Is metaverse land rush fake and are all metaverses the same?

목차

NFTandGameFi

2023년 3월 8일에 게재된 다른 기사

Indian Finance Ministry: Crypto Trading Is Now Subject to AML Laws

Login With IOTA is Here

Outer Ring February Game DevUpdate

BTC’s Social Dominance May Be a Sign of the Market Rebounding

STEPN Users Take a Step Back from Running after Airdrop Misery

TCD: Telos' 2023 Blockchain Roadmap Unveiled

무료 뉴스레터에 가입하여 매일 최신 암호화폐 소식을 받아보세요!