Vitalik Buterin published Twitter threads on idealism in the crypto scene and Optimism's governance structure.
When Vitalik Buterin posts, crypto listens. The Ethereum founder has become an important — maybe even the most important — bellwether for the state of the crypto industry.
It takes an anti-crypto stance, calling blockchain-based financial products a "disaster for financial privacy" and saying blockchains are "poorly suited for just about every purpose currently touted as a present or potential source of public benefit."
The letter asks for a "truly responsible approach to technological innovation" and asks for investor protection (read: regulation) by lawmakers.
Buterin suggested several possible explanations for why the crypto community is developing in this way. One of them may simply be that a growing community attracts undesired elements:
"This is an inevitable part of becoming bigger. In non-financial movements too, various classes of normies and often soon grifters move in over time."
Buterin also sees the spread of social media and the fear of dystopia as possible explanations but also pointed out positive, non-financial use cases of blockchain technology, like the Ethereum identity space. He concludes:
"I guess the conclusion is, peacekeeping and cooperation-seeking needs to be an explicit effort rather than peace being an assumed default."
Buterin on Optimism
Later that day, Buterin also published his thoughts on Optimism's new governance structure. The Ethereum layer-two solution implements a two-tiered governance solution by using the "Token House" and the "Citizen House." The Token House is composed of OP token holders, while the Citizen House consists of “soul-bound” non-transferrable citizenship NFT owners.
Buterin praised this approach, saying:
"Optimism explicitly has goals *other* than just "make OP go up", and the only way to do that long-term is with explicit representation of non-token-holder interests."
Optimism's two-tiered approach sees the two houses share responsibilities in the governance process. Buterin has long been an advocate of crypto moving on beyond token price-fixated voting mechanisms. He notes: