The latest in the ongoing clash between the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and leading U.S. crypto exchange Coinbase comes as Coinbase files a narrow action just yesterday April 24, compelling the SEC to give a ‘yes or no’ answer to a petition filed last Jul...
The latest in the ongoing clash between the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and leading U.S. crypto exchange Coinbase comes as Coinbase files a narrow action just yesterday April 24, compelling the SEC to give a ‘yes or no’ answer to a petition filed last July 2022.
The petition in question contains a list of questions asking for clarity on the nature of securities and how the agency goes about determining whether an asset is a security or not. On top of this, another petition filed just last March 20 asks the agency to exclude staking in its list of securities. The July petition went unanswered for nine months and thus causing Coinbase to file the narrow action in hopes of forcing the agency’s response.
Coinbase Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal wrote a blog post where he noted that the agency seems to:
“[have] already made up its mind to [categorically] deny [the] petition. But they haven’t told the public yet.”
The SEC’s response is important because it would allow Coinbase to challenge them in court and then argue for regulatory clarity.
The increasing significance of regulatory clarity within the cryptocurrency sector stems from several factors that have led Coinbase to file a specific action lawsuit against the SEC. With the prospect of investor protection, clearly defined regulations ensure that investors are protected from fraudulent schemes and practices in the crypto space. In the absence of regulatory clarity, bad actors could exploit loopholes or the lack of enforcement, potentially harming investors.
This also points to Coinbase' legitimacy within the crypto industry, given how regulatory clarity becomes crucial in establishing Coinbase and the the cryptocurrency industry by extension, as a legitimate and viable financial ecosystem.
Proper regulatory frameworks allow businesses to operate within the confines of the law, promoting trust, stability, and long-term growth. If and when regulatory clarity from the SEC is achieved, this will have one optimal effect: a better environment for regulation. Clear regulations would likely encourage innovation by providing a framework that guides the development and adoption of new technologies. In contrast, a lack of clarity may stifle innovation (and competition, given the environment) as businesses become hesitant to invest in new projects or technologies that might be subject to future regulatory scrutiny.
The SEC’s brute force approach in dealing with crypto exchanges, as well as its head Gary Gensler’s comments, has earned the crypto community’s ire. More importantly, the agency has refused to give a proper definition to securities, which is what prompted Coinbase’s petitions in the first place. As a backhanded response to these petitions, the SEC slapped Coinbase with a Wells notice last March 22.
How the SEC will respond to this narrow action will be crucial; it will be a, if not ‘the’, defining moment for the nascent crypto sector in the United States. Should things go even further south, Coinbase will be forced to relocate to other countries with a more welcoming environment for crypto.
Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.