<p>In a context of increasing tension between financial regulators and crypto platforms, the announcement of a new lawsuit by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) against Binance has stirred up a storm. The SEC accuses Binance of artificially inflating its transaction volumes and violating several rules, particularly regarding access for US users to its platform. However, a detail has caught the attention of some observers: the unexpected absence of Ripple’s XRP from the list of cryptocurrencies that the SEC now considers securities. While XRP has been under attack by the SEC for the past two years, this absence raises numerous questions. Why is XRP missing from this list? Is it a deliberate strategy on the part of the SEC? What could be the repercussions of this decision?</p><div class="thumbnail post-cover-image"><img src="https://www.cointribune.com/app/uploads/2023/06/Binance-sec-xrp-1024x683.png" srcset="https://www.cointribune.com/app/uploads/2023/06/Binance-sec-xrp-1024x683.png 1024w, https://www.cointribune.com/app/uploads/2023/06/Binance-sec-xrp-300x200.png 300w, https://www.cointribune.com/app/uploads/2023/06/Binance-sec-xrp-768x512.png 768w, https://www.cointribune.com/app/uploads/2023/06/Binance-sec-xrp.png 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" class="post-cover-image--img" alt="Binance, SEC and XRP logos"></div><div class="my-4"></div>



<h2 id="h-the-unexpected-absence-of-xrp-from-the-sec-s-unregistered-securities">The unexpected absence of XRP from the SEC’s unregistered securities</h2>



<p>Since Monday, June 5, <a href="https://www.cointribune.com/faut-il-fuir-de-binance/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">the crypto platform Binance</a> has been in the SEC’s crosshairs. The regulator has officially filed charges against the firm. Accusing Binance of several facts that had already leaked to the press.</p><div class="my-4"><div class="ads ">
    </div>
</div>



<p>Specifically, the regulator accuses Binance of artificially inflating the volume of its transactions in order to use the funds entrusted to it by users for other purposes. Furthermore, the SEC alleges that Binance failed to restrict access to its platform for US users. The result of all this is that the company would have deceived investors about the actual control exerted by the platform.</p>



<p>In the press release announcing the legal proceedings against Binance, the SEC made new revelations concerning assets that the regulator now considers securities.</p>



<p>The list includes 61 cryptocurrencies that would be unregistered securities. In other words, it is a list of assets subject to the legal strictures of the SEC. A total that represents $100 billion worth of tokens in circulation on the market.</p>



<p>To everyone’s surprise, one token stands out by its absence from this list: Ripple’s XRP. The situation is inexplicable given the ongoing feud between the SEC and Ripple. However, <a href="https://u.today/heres-why-xrp-is-absent-from-binance-lawsuit" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">there might be reasons behind it</a>.</p>



<h2 id="an-absence-justified-by-strategic-reasons">An absence justified by strategic reasons?</h2>



<p>If the absence of XRP is so surprising, it’s because its presence would have been logical. Especially since the asset has been undergoing the SEC’s torments for the past two years. Given the complete lack of sense in the absence of the asset from the list of securities mentioned by the SEC, speculations are running wild.</p>



<p>According to these speculations, the notable absence is not unrelated to the ongoing lawsuit against Ripple. According to some experts, it could be a deliberate choice by the SEC to protect its own interests.</p>



<p>Thus, the regulator might fear that taking the opposite stance could ultimately backfire. This option cannot be ruled out in the case of <a href="https://www.cointribune.com/proces-sec-vs-ripple-un-expert-juridique-prevoit-une-victoire-eclatante-a-75/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">a victory for Ripple</a>. Such a situation could potentially undermine the SEC’s credibility in the case against Binance. At the very least, this choice would be pragmatic. It would aim to prevent the stock market watchdog from facing decisions that would be, at the very least, incoherent.</p>

Binance vs. SEC: Why is XRP missing from the SEC’s list of mentioned cryptocurrencies?

Innehållsförteckning

Cointribune EN

Andra artiklar publicerade 7 juni 2023

REVEALED – My PROFIT Making Strategy in Crypto Bear

Sosial Engaement Burning

CRYPTO SHOCK – Binance & Coinbase SUED by SEC – What’s Next?!?

A cold wallet can only be an air-gapped wallet

US SEC’s Recent Actions Could Have Severe Consequences, Cautions Hong Kong Lawyer

The 1inch DAO discontinues swap surplus collection

Prenumerera på vårt nyhetsbrev och få kryptouppdateringar varje dag!