Bitcoin

<p>According to a recent report published by the People’s Courts of the People’s Republic of China, a Chinese court has recognized the legal status of virtual assets, having analyzed their attributes within the framework of Chinese criminal law.</p><p>The court unequivocally stated that virtual assets are considered legal property under the current legal policy framework and are thus protected by law.</p><p>The People’s Courts of the People’s Republic of China exercise judicial power independently, free from interference by administrative or public organizations. They have responsibility for adjudicating civil, criminal, and administrative cases.</p><h2 id="header-0">Property classification</h2><p>Local news source Odaily News<a href="https://www.odaily.news/newsflash/334415" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow"> reported</a> on the development on Friday, indicating that the report, titled “Identification of the Property Attributes of Virtual Currency and Disposal of Property Involved in the Case,” explicitly recognized the economic attributes of virtual assets, leading to their classification as property.</p><p>This declaration is particularly significant in light of China’s sweeping ban on decentralized cryptocurrencies. Despite this ban, the report argues that virtual assets held by individuals should enjoy legal protection within the existing policy framework.</p><p>Furthermore, the report proposed recommendations for addressing crimes involving virtual assets. It emphasized that in cases where money and property are involved, confiscation should be based on the integration of criminal and civil law. The approach taken aims to strike a balance between safeguarding personal property rights while also addressing broader social and public interests.</p><h2 id="header-1">Contentious approach to crypto</h2><p>While China has been making every effort to promote its central bank digital currency (CBDC) and the development of blockchain and metaverse-related technology within the country, its stance on decentralized cryptocurrencies has been contentious at best.</p><p>Its approach in that respect has been marked by a blanket ban on crypto-related activities such as mining and trading and the prohibition of foreign crypto exchanges from serving customers within mainland China. Nevertheless, Chinese courts have consistently taken a more nuanced view without necessarily contradicting the government’s approach.</p><h2 id="header-2">Differing interpretations</h2><p>The divergence between national policy and court rulings first emerged in 2019 when the Hangzhou Internet Court found that Bitcoin is a form of virtual property, and on that basis, it is safeguarded by the law from the point of view of property rights. In May 2022, a Shanghai court affirmed that Bitcoin qualifies as virtual property and, as such, falls under the purview of property rights.</p><h2 id="header-3">Global issue</h2><p>It’s not just the Chinese courts that are grappling with the issue of clarifying property rights relative to virtual assets. In April of this year, a case in Hong Kong involving defunct crypto exchange Gatecoin resulted in the courts<a href="https://medium.com/&#64;coinness.gl/hong-kong-deems-crypto-as-property-e5f4515b665d" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow"> determining</a> that cryptocurrency is property and that on that basis, it’s “capable of being held in trust.”</p><p>In July a Singaporean court<a href="https://medium.com/&#64;coinness.gl/singapore-high-court-recognizes-cryptocurrency-as-personal-property-de52fdcacc9" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow"> determined</a> that cryptocurrency is capable of being held in trust and on that basis, it should be recognized as property. Earlier this year, the High Court of Justice in London recognized non-fungible tokens (NFTs) as property.</p><p>The report from the People’s Court reaffirms the legal status of virtual assets as protected property under Chinese law. This development highlights the ongoing divergence between China’s regulatory policy and the judicial interpretation of virtual assets, signaling a potential evolution in the country’s approach to cryptocurrencies.</p>

Chinese Court Recognizes Virtual Assets as Legal Property

Spis treści

CoinNess Global

Inne artykuły opublikowane 1 wrz 2023

Giddy, a self-custody smart wallet, extends to Ethereum

The Best Bitcoin Mining Tutorials for Mastering the Basics / Issue 1

SEC Might Prepare Argument to Reject Bitcoin ETF – Berenberg

Robinhood Strikes $605.7M Deal With U.S. Marshals To Reclaim Shares Seized From Bankrupt FTX Foun...

98.52% of WLD Investors in Loss, Is Worldcoin’s Future in Jeopardy?

Crypto Exchange OKX Looks to Expand into India

Zapisz się na bezpłatny newsletter i otrzymuj codzień aktualności ze świata kryptowalut!