2024

Daily

OpenAI and Microsoft are facing a new lawsuit from the Center for Investigative Reporting (CIR). The CIR says that OpenAI has used its published content from Mother Jones and Reveal websites to train earlier versions of ChatGPT. 
Also read: <a href="https://www.cryptopolitan.com/openai-removes-chatgpt-ai-voice/">OpenAI scraps ChatGPT voice after Scarlett Johansson controversy</a>&nbsp; 
The CIR, the plaintiff says that OpenAI used its content without permission or a promise of compensation. CIR, founded in 1977, operates the nonprofit American magazine Mother Jones and Reveal podcast.&nbsp; 
<h2 id="span-style-font-weight-400-cir-sues-openai-and-microsoft-over-copyright-infringement-span">CIR sues OpenAI and Microsoft over copyright infringement&nbsp;</h2> 
The Center for Investigative Reporting (CIR) <a href="https://www.motherjones.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/CIR_Lawsuit_Against-OpenAI_06.27.24.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">filed</a> the lawsuit in federal court in New York on Thursday. The nonprofit organization accused OpenAI and Microsoft of using their content without permission or compensation. The <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Center_for_Investigative_Reporting" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">CIR</a> says OpenAI has violated copyright laws by using its content to train ChatGPT. 
The CEO of CIR Monika Bauerlein said, “This free rider behavior is not only unfair, it is a violation of copyright. The work of journalists, at CIR and everywhere, is valuable, and OpenAI and Microsoft know it.” 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="550" data-dnt="true"> 
 🚨[AI copyright lawsuit] The Center for Investigative Reporting (behind&nbsp;<a href="https://twitter.com/MotherJones?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@MotherJones</a> &amp;&nbsp;<a href="https://twitter.com/reveal?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@reveal</a>)&nbsp;sues OpenAI &amp; Microsoft for copyright infringement. Quotes: 
 "Defendants copied, used, abridged, and displayed CIR’s valuable content without CIR’s permission or authorization, and… <a href="https://t.co/SeZ0VtDOMY" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">pic.twitter.com/SeZ0VtDOMY</a> 
 — Luiza Jarovsky (@LuizaJarovsky) <a href="https://twitter.com/LuizaJarovsky/status/1807136831982744014?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">June 29, 2024</a>
</blockquote> 
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> 
In the official complaint, the plaintiff hired a data scientist to analyze the <a href="https://paperswithcode.com/dataset/openwebtext" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">OpenWebText</a> database. OpenWebText is an approximation of <a href="https://paperswithcode.com/dataset/webtext" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">WebText</a>, which is a corpus of scraped web pages created by OpenAI. The data scientist found that the dataset contains 17,434 URLs from Mother Jones and 415 from Reveal. OpenWebText and WebText have slightly different numbers of Mother Jones articles because the scraping process happened on different days. 
The plaintiff said in the official complaint, 
<blockquote>
 “When they populated their training sets with works of journalism, Defendants had a choice: to respect works of journalism, or not. Defendants chose the latter”
</blockquote> 
Also read: <a href="https://www.cryptopolitan.com/openai-scientist-ilya-sutskever-bid-farewell/">OpenAI’s chief scientist, Ilya Sutskever, bids farewell</a> 
OpenAI used two algorithms, Dragnet and Newspaper, to build the WebText database. Dragnet is designed to separate the main article content from other parts of the website, such as the header, footer, title, author name, and copyright notices. When OpenAI scrapped Mother Jones’ website, it removed anything in its footer and header. Additionally, the ChatGPT maker removed the copyright notice and terms of use information as per the <a href="https://www.motherjones.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/CIR_Lawsuit_Against-OpenAI_06.27.24.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">complaint</a>.&nbsp; 
Furthermore, the plaintiff claims Microsoft knew that the scraped URLs had journalism content without author names, titles, and copyright notices, facilitating copyright infringement by Bing AI and ChatGPT. 
The CIR is seeking profits from OpenAI and Microsoft and actual or statutory damages. The amount stated is a minimum of $750 per infringed work and $2,500 per DMCA violation. 
<h2 id="span-style-font-weight-400-openai-faces-lawsuits-from-other-publications-span">OpenAI faces lawsuits from other publications</h2> 
This is not the first lawsuit filed against OpenAI for copyright infringement. Since the release of ChatGPT in late 2022, OpenAI and Microsoft have faced numerous lawsuits from big names like the New York Times, The Intercept, the New York Daily News, and the Chicago Tribune. 
Also read: <a href="https://www.cryptopolitan.com/openai-and-google-deepmind-hiding-ai-risks/">Employees claim OpenAI and Google DeepMind hiding AI risks</a> 
Meanwhile, some <a href="https://x.com/ai_for_success/status/1806340611806834895" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">major publishers</a> and internet giants have signed licensing agreements with OpenAI, giving it access to their archives. These include TIME Magazine, News Corp, the Financial Times, Vox Media, the Associated Press, The Atlantic, Stack Overflow, and Reddit. 
Cryptopolitan reporting by Randa Moses

OpenAI and Microsoft face a new lawsuit from CIR

Table of Contents

Cryptopolitan_News

Alte articole publicate pe 30 iun. 2024

This Altcoin Could Easily Pump 2000% | Solana or..?

Blast Token Surges 40% Post-Launch, Outshines Recent Airdrops Amid Criticism and Scams

Riot Games opens 2XKO closed alpha test sign-ups

Bitcoin mining status – No more selling? Here’s what that means and doesn’t mean

MoonBag Coin’s Presale Success Leaves Bonk and Dogwifhat in Danger

BNB’s rally falters – Is $500 the next bearish target?

Join our free newsletter for daily crypto updates!