Curve Finance Founder Says DAO Disagreements Signal Governance Health


#Decentralized autonomous organizations that reach every decision without friction may actually be displaying a warning sign rather than a strength, according to #CurveFinance founder Dr. Michael Egorov. Speaking to Cointelegraph, Egorov said that when all votes pass automatically and without debate, it typically means participants have stopped paying attention to governance altogether. He described governance apathy, measured by low or absent voter participation, as the first visible symptom.


Egorov pointed to two recent governance episodes to illustrate the point. The first involved Curve's own #DAO in 2024, when a proposal to grant Swiss Stake AG—the primary developer behind Curve Finance—approximately $6.3 million faced substantial pushback from DAO members. The controversy prompted a revision, and when the resubmitted proposal went to a vote in December 2025, it drew over 80% member turnout.


That level of participation stands in contrast to broader industry patterns. An analysis by blockchain development company LamprosTech found that voter turnout across most DAOs rarely exceeds 15%, which concentrates decision-making power among a small group of consistently active participants. Curve's token holder structure, which requires locking tokens for extended periods, is designed to encourage #longer-term governance engagement, Egorov said.


The second example Egorov cited was a dispute that emerged in December 2025 between Aave Labs, the primary development company behind Aave products, and the Aave DAO. The conflict centered on fees generated through an integration with DeFi exchange aggregator CoW Swap, which were directed to a wallet controlled by Aave Labs rather than the DAO treasury. Members challenged the arrangement, sparking a broader debate about which entity holds rightful #control over intellectual property on the platform.

image
February 22, 2026 at 11:48 PM