Deep Dive
1. Post-Trump Campaign Refund Fallout (Bearish Impact)
Overview: RACA initiated refunds in July 2025 after a partnership with the Trump campaign dissolved, per a Cointelegraph report. While the move demonstrates accountability, it also highlights execution risks in high-profile collaborations.
What this means: The refund process could pressure RACA’s liquidity and erode investor confidence in near-term partnerships. Historical precedent shows failed campaigns often lead to prolonged sell-offs in low-cap tokens like RACA (-80% YoY).
Overview: RACA’s USM Metaverse and NFT marketplace operate in a crowded sector. No major adoption metrics or upgrades were disclosed in retrieved project docs, raising questions about differentiation.
What this means: Without visible user growth or technical milestones, RACA risks fading against rivals. However, surprise metaverse adoption spikes or NFT utility expansions could catalyze rebounds, given its 6.7% weekly gain amid broader crypto gains.
3. Altcoin Liquidity Crunch (Bearish Impact)
Overview: The crypto Fear & Greed Index sits at 31 (as of 11 November 2025), with BTC dominance at 59.1%—ahead of RACA’s 0.0005% market share. Altcoin season metrics remain stagnant at 30/100, per CMC data.
What this means: Risk-averse capital allocation favors Bitcoin, starving low-cap alts like RACA of liquidity. Until sentiment shifts, RACA’s 24h volume ($3.58M) and -24% 60d returns may persist.
Conclusion
RACA’s price hinges on rebuilding trust post-refunds and delivering metaverse differentiation, but macro headwinds and altcoin apathy pose steep barriers. Can USM’s NFT integrations or governance updates counterbalance the liquidity drain from Bitcoin’s dominance?