Deep Dive
1. Deflationary Tokenomics (Bullish Impact)
Overview:
MWXT’s capped supply (1B) combines 20% automatic burns on marketplace fees and quarterly buybacks using 15% of profits. As of December 2025, 10,000 tokens have been burned, with burns accelerating as SME usage grows.
What this means:
The dual burn mechanism directly links token scarcity to platform activity. For example, if MWX hits its 1M SME target, daily burns could outpace new supply unlocks (e.g., team tokens vesting in 2026), creating structural upward pressure. However, short-term impact depends on whether SME growth outpaces vesting schedules.
2. Exchange Listings & Liquidity (Mixed Impact)
Overview:
MWXT listed on BitMart (Dec 4, 2025) and plans a 2026 Tier-1 exchange listing. However, 95.62% of the circulating supply is held by top 10 wallets, per CoinCu, increasing volatility risk during unlocks.
What this means:
New listings improve accessibility but could trigger sell-offs if early investors exit. The 137.46M unlocked supply (vs. 44.8M circulating) creates a 3:1 dilution risk if holders cash out. Monitoring exchange inflows and vesting schedules post-2026 is critical.
3. SME Onboarding & AI Demand (Bullish Impact)
Overview:
MWX has onboarded 500+ SMEs since September 2025, backed by partnerships with Indonesia’s Ministry of MSMEs (100K SME target) and plans for LatAm/Europe expansion. The global AI market is projected to grow 26% annually (Cointelegraph).
What this means:
Every SME using MWXT for AI tools (e.g., marketing/finance automation) directly fuels token demand. Success hinges on converting trials (2,000+ given) to paid users – a 25% conversion rate could double burns by mid-2026.
Conclusion
MWXT’s price trajectory depends on balancing SME-driven demand against vesting-related sell pressure. The deflationary model offers long-term upside, but near-term risks linger from concentrated holdings. Will Q1 2026 profit buybacks offset unlock-driven selling?